CAJ | 학술논문

[目的]结合自然科学期刊及社会科学期刊评价指标体系与评价方法，探索一个适合于护理期刊的评价指标体系。[方法]选择我国10个省市高校图书馆领域、护理期刊编辑领域及护理学科领域专家24名为研究对象，采用文献研究法、德尔菲法、层次分析法及数理统计方法构建护理期刊学术影响力评价指标体系。[结果]经过两轮专家咨询，最终确定评价指标为3个一级指标、8个二级指标。一级指标的权重分别为期刊引用指标(0.7306)、期刊来源指标(0.1884)、网络传播指标(0.0810)；二级指标组合权重按权重大小排序，依次为总被引频次(0.3616)、影响因子(0.2273)、来源文献量(0.1118)、他引总引比(0.0971)、平均引文数(0.0470)、高被引论文数(0.0446)、地区分布数(0.0296)、Web下载量(0.0810)。各级指标权重均满足一致性检验，所得权重系数符合逻辑。[结论]本研究构建的指标体系适用于护理期刊的评价，且体现了护理专业的特色。
[목적]결합자연과학기간급사회과학기간평개지표체계여평개방법，탐색일개괄합우호리기간적평개지표체계。[방법]선택아국10개성시고교도서관영역、호리기간편집영역급호이학과영역전가24명위연구대상，채용문헌연구법、덕이비법、층차분석법급수리통계방법구건호리기간학술영향력평개지표체계。[결과]경과량륜전가자순，최종학정평개지표위3개일급지표、8개이급지표。일급지표적권중분별위기간인용지표(0.7306)、기간래원지표(0.1884)、망락전파지표(0.0810)；이급지표조합권중안권중대소배서，의차위총피인빈차(0.3616)、영향인자(0.2273)、래원문헌량(0.1118)、타인총인비(0.0971)、평균인문수(0.0470)、고피인논문수(0.0446)、지구분포수(0.0296)、Web하재량(0.0810)。각급지표권중균만족일치성검험，소득권중계수부합라집。[결론]본연구구건적지표체계괄용우호리기간적평개，차체현료호리전업적특색。
Objective:To explore a suitable evaluation system of nursing journals combined with Natural science and social science journals evaluation system and method.Methods:A total of 24 experts in the library field, nursing journals field and nursing disciplines field in universities in 10 provinces in China were selected as the research obj ects,using literature research,Delphi,AHP and mathematical statistics were used for construction of evaluation indexes of nursing j ournals academic influence.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,e-valuation indexes were determined including three first level indicators,eight secondary indicators.Right level index weights were Journal Citation Index (0.730 6),periodicals source index (0.188 4),the network spread in-dex (0.081 0);secondary indexes combination weights were weighted more heavily small order,followed by to-tal citations (0.361 6),the impact factor (0.227 3),the amount of source documents(0.1118),he cited overall lead ratio (0.097 1),the average number of citations (0.047 0),the number of highly cited papers (0.044 6), the number of distribution areas (0.029 6),Web downloads (0.081 0).All levels of index weight were met con-sistency test,the resultant weighting coefficient was logical.Conclusion:The constructed evaluation system in this study is suitable for evaluation of nursing j ournals,and reflects the characteristics of the nursing profession.