CAJ | 학술논문

无论是重塑朱次琦的经师人师形象，接着朱次琦的“四行”、“五学”往下说，还是遍注儒家经典，简朝亮都是结合新的社会形势，朝着朱次琦学说的既定目标、具体路径为它输进新内容，使获得了较大发展的朱次琦学说延至民国中后期，并与同出一门的康有为别出的岭南近现代新儒学产生尖锐冲突，呈现岭南儒学近代转型的复杂性、艰巨性。因此，钱穆认为简朝亮未能传承朱次琦之学，实是未能抓住简朝亮经学生涯乃至朱次琦学说的要害。
무론시중소주차기적경사인사형상，접착주차기적“사행”、“오학”왕하설，환시편주유가경전，간조량도시결합신적사회형세，조착주차기학설적기정목표、구체로경위타수진신내용，사획득료교대발전적주차기학설연지민국중후기，병여동출일문적강유위별출적령남근현대신유학산생첨예충돌，정현령남유학근대전형적복잡성、간거성。인차，전목인위간조량미능전승주차기지학，실시미능조주간조량경학생애내지주차기학설적요해。
Combined with new social situation ,Jian Chaoliang reshaped Zhu Ciqi’s image of being a teacher , investigated Zhu’s“four actions of morality cultivation” and“five areas of studies” and then he annotated many classics of the Confucian school .He followed Zhu’s set goals and roads ,and input new contents , extending Zhu’s theory to the semi-late period of the Republic of China .It had sharp conflict with the new Confucian school in Lingnan ,reflecting its complexity and hardship .Therefore ,Qian Mu’s view of Jian Chaoliang’s failing to inherit Zhu’ s theory failed to understand the gist of Jian Chaoliang ’ s academic thoughts ,nor the theory of Zhu Ciqi .