中国健康心理学杂志
中國健康心理學雜誌
중국건강심이학잡지
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL
2015年
7期
1042-1045
,共4页
焦点解决心态%量表修订%信度%效度
焦點解決心態%量錶脩訂%信度%效度
초점해결심태%량표수정%신도%효도
Solution focused mindset%Scale revision%Reliability%Validity
目的：对焦点解决心态问卷（ SFMS）进行中文版的修订、检验本问卷的信效度，并探究焦点解决心态与自我效能感和积极率之间的相关关系。方法：结合中国文化及语言习惯对SFMS进行中文版修订，接受培训者（44人）和待接受培训者（138人）完成了问卷测试，问卷还包括一般自我效能感问卷（ GSES）和积极情感消极情感量表（ PANAS），结果：修订量表中的各项目有较好的区分度；探索性因素分析结果显示，修订后SFMS是单维的，这与原量表结构一致，单因素潜变量可解释总方差的46．6％；验证性因素分析显示χ2／df＝1．99，NFI、GFI、CFI、IFI都在0．90以上且近似1，各项拟合指数均符合测量学要求；修订量表的内部一致性系数达0．85；该量表与成人素质希望量表（ADHS）的效标关联效度为0．42（P＜0．01）。中文版SFMS与GSES、PANSA的相关系数分别为0．38、0．40（P＜0．01）。结论：中文版SFMS具有较好的信度和效度与自我效能感和积极率存在正相关。
目的：對焦點解決心態問捲（ SFMS）進行中文版的脩訂、檢驗本問捲的信效度，併探究焦點解決心態與自我效能感和積極率之間的相關關繫。方法：結閤中國文化及語言習慣對SFMS進行中文版脩訂，接受培訓者（44人）和待接受培訓者（138人）完成瞭問捲測試，問捲還包括一般自我效能感問捲（ GSES）和積極情感消極情感量錶（ PANAS），結果：脩訂量錶中的各項目有較好的區分度；探索性因素分析結果顯示，脩訂後SFMS是單維的，這與原量錶結構一緻，單因素潛變量可解釋總方差的46．6％；驗證性因素分析顯示χ2／df＝1．99，NFI、GFI、CFI、IFI都在0．90以上且近似1，各項擬閤指數均符閤測量學要求；脩訂量錶的內部一緻性繫數達0．85；該量錶與成人素質希望量錶（ADHS）的效標關聯效度為0．42（P＜0．01）。中文版SFMS與GSES、PANSA的相關繫數分彆為0．38、0．40（P＜0．01）。結論：中文版SFMS具有較好的信度和效度與自我效能感和積極率存在正相關。
목적：대초점해결심태문권（ SFMS）진행중문판적수정、검험본문권적신효도，병탐구초점해결심태여자아효능감화적겁솔지간적상관관계。방법：결합중국문화급어언습관대SFMS진행중문판수정，접수배훈자（44인）화대접수배훈자（138인）완성료문권측시，문권환포괄일반자아효능감문권（ GSES）화적겁정감소겁정감량표（ PANAS），결과：수정량표중적각항목유교호적구분도；탐색성인소분석결과현시，수정후SFMS시단유적，저여원량표결구일치，단인소잠변량가해석총방차적46．6％；험증성인소분석현시χ2／df＝1．99，NFI、GFI、CFI、IFI도재0．90이상차근사1，각항의합지수균부합측량학요구；수정량표적내부일치성계수체0．85；해량표여성인소질희망량표（ADHS）적효표관련효도위0．42（P＜0．01）。중문판SFMS여GSES、PANSA적상관계수분별위0．38、0．40（P＜0．01）。결론：중문판SFMS구유교호적신도화효도여자아효능감화적겁솔존재정상관。
Objective:To revise the Solution Focused Mindset Scale( SFMS) into Chinese version and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese people.To study the correlation between solution focused mindset and self-efficacy&positive ratio.Methods:We revised the Solution Focused Mindset Scale into Chinese version which was combined with Chinese culture and the codes of language.44 people who had learned solution focused interview techniques and 138 people who were going to accept the training about solution focused interview techniques were assessed to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version.Adult Dispositional Hope Scale( ADHS) was filled to examine the criterion-related validity of the Chinese version.The General Self -Efficacy Scale ( GSES ) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule ( PANAS) were filled to explore the correlation between solution focused mindset and self -efficacy &positive ratio.Results:The item discrimination of revised SFMS was acceptable.Exploratory factor analy-sis revealed that the structure was consistent with the original scale, the revised SFMS was a one-factor model,and single-factor latent variable explained 46.6% of the total variance.And the results of con-firmatory factor analysis(χ2/df =2.82,GFI =0.92,NFI =0.99,CFI =0.99,IFI =0.99,RMSEA =0.08 ) indicated that this model provided a reasonable good fit for Chinese people.The internal consistency reliability was good for SFMS,which was 0.85.The criterion-related validity was 0.42(P<0.01).The correlation coefficient between the Chinese version of SFMS and GSES&PANAS were 0.38,0.40( Ps<0.01) .Conclusion:The Chinese version of Solution Focused Mindset Scale has good reliability and valid-ity,and it is positively correlated with self-efficacy and positive ratio.
