数理医药学杂志
數理醫藥學雜誌
수리의약학잡지
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL MEDICINE
2015年
6期
899-901
,共3页
灸法%临床特征%计量研究
灸法%臨床特徵%計量研究
구법%림상특정%계량연구
moxibustion%clinical features%bibliometric analysis
目的::对比研究古今临床文献中灸法临床特点,以发展和完善灸法的临床功能。方法:以灸法古籍《神灸经纶》和近5年(2009~2013)公开发表的灸法临床文献为样本,采用计量方法分别从疾病种类、取穴和操作等方面分析其临床特征。结果:现代文献中灸法治疗的疾病共8类146种,《神灸经纶》中灸法证治疾病10类392种;现代文献中灸法选穴范围相对较窄(总215穴<298穴),而每个处方的用穴数稍多(平均4.07穴>3.42穴);《神灸经纶》主要采用艾炷直接灸,现代文献中灸法多与其它治法配合使用,并更多采用艾条悬灸。结论:古今灸法在疾病种类、取穴、操作等方面均有较大不同,现代灸法临床应用有待进一步发展。
目的::對比研究古今臨床文獻中灸法臨床特點,以髮展和完善灸法的臨床功能。方法:以灸法古籍《神灸經綸》和近5年(2009~2013)公開髮錶的灸法臨床文獻為樣本,採用計量方法分彆從疾病種類、取穴和操作等方麵分析其臨床特徵。結果:現代文獻中灸法治療的疾病共8類146種,《神灸經綸》中灸法證治疾病10類392種;現代文獻中灸法選穴範圍相對較窄(總215穴<298穴),而每箇處方的用穴數稍多(平均4.07穴>3.42穴);《神灸經綸》主要採用艾炷直接灸,現代文獻中灸法多與其它治法配閤使用,併更多採用艾條懸灸。結論:古今灸法在疾病種類、取穴、操作等方麵均有較大不同,現代灸法臨床應用有待進一步髮展。
목적::대비연구고금림상문헌중구법림상특점,이발전화완선구법적림상공능。방법:이구법고적《신구경륜》화근5년(2009~2013)공개발표적구법림상문헌위양본,채용계량방법분별종질병충류、취혈화조작등방면분석기림상특정。결과:현대문헌중구법치료적질병공8류146충,《신구경륜》중구법증치질병10류392충;현대문헌중구법선혈범위상대교착(총215혈<298혈),이매개처방적용혈수초다(평균4.07혈>3.42혈);《신구경륜》주요채용애주직접구,현대문헌중구법다여기타치법배합사용,병경다채용애조현구。결론:고금구법재질병충류、취혈、조작등방면균유교대불동,현대구법림상응용유대진일보발전。
Objective:To compare the clinical features of moxibustion based on the studies in ancient book and contemporary publications.Methods:Ancient book of “Shen jiu jing lun”and publications (2009~2013), reported the clinical applications of moxibustion,were collected.Statistical analysis was performed according to the indications,prescriptions of acupoints and operations for moxibustion.Results:There were 146 indica-tions of moxibustion reported in contemporary publications,correspond to 392 in “Shen jiu jing lun”;The modern application of acupoints showed narrower range (total 215 <298 acupoints)and bigger prescription (average 4.07>3.42 acupoints)than ancient;“Shen jiu jing lun”had always used direct moxibustion with moxa-cone in clinic,and the modern probably prefer indirect moxibustion with moxa-roll.Conclusion:There are many differences between ancient and modern moxibustion clinic in indications,prescriptions of acupoints and operations.