中国药物警戒
中國藥物警戒
중국약물경계
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOVIGILANCE
2015年
5期
271-274
,共4页
阿司匹林肠溶片%药品说明书%对比
阿司匹林腸溶片%藥品說明書%對比
아사필림장용편%약품설명서%대비
aspirin%drug instruction%comparison
目的:系统总结阿司匹林肠溶片说明书条目的规范性与内容的准确性,为进一步管理与完善说明书提供依据。方法检索国内外相关药品网站或数据库,纳入2002~2013年各药品市场存在的非处方阿司匹林肠溶片说明书进行汇总分析。结果共纳入说明书82份,按规格和用法用量划分为大、小剂量两类。分析发现国产说明书基本条目标注不正确情况多在非安全性信息和禁忌、注意事项部分,国产小剂量肠溶片适应证、用法用量等内容尚未统一。此外,国内外说明书适应证、用法用量和适用人群等安全性信息存在不一致,小剂量组差异较大剂量组明显。结论现行国产阿司匹林肠溶片说明书条目规范情况尚可,但小剂量肠溶片安全性信息规范较差。与国外及国内进口肠溶片说明书相比,国产的安全性信息缺乏本地研究的结果,儿童用药急需重视。
目的:繫統總結阿司匹林腸溶片說明書條目的規範性與內容的準確性,為進一步管理與完善說明書提供依據。方法檢索國內外相關藥品網站或數據庫,納入2002~2013年各藥品市場存在的非處方阿司匹林腸溶片說明書進行彙總分析。結果共納入說明書82份,按規格和用法用量劃分為大、小劑量兩類。分析髮現國產說明書基本條目標註不正確情況多在非安全性信息和禁忌、註意事項部分,國產小劑量腸溶片適應證、用法用量等內容尚未統一。此外,國內外說明書適應證、用法用量和適用人群等安全性信息存在不一緻,小劑量組差異較大劑量組明顯。結論現行國產阿司匹林腸溶片說明書條目規範情況尚可,但小劑量腸溶片安全性信息規範較差。與國外及國內進口腸溶片說明書相比,國產的安全性信息缺乏本地研究的結果,兒童用藥急需重視。
목적:계통총결아사필림장용편설명서조목적규범성여내용적준학성,위진일보관리여완선설명서제공의거。방법검색국내외상관약품망참혹수거고,납입2002~2013년각약품시장존재적비처방아사필림장용편설명서진행회총분석。결과공납입설명서82빈,안규격화용법용량화분위대、소제량량류。분석발현국산설명서기본조목표주불정학정황다재비안전성신식화금기、주의사항부분,국산소제량장용편괄응증、용법용량등내용상미통일。차외,국내외설명서괄응증、용법용량화괄용인군등안전성신식존재불일치,소제량조차이교대제량조명현。결론현행국산아사필림장용편설명서조목규범정황상가,단소제량장용편안전성신식규범교차。여국외급국내진구장용편설명서상비,국산적안전성신식결핍본지연구적결과,인동용약급수중시。
Objective To improve the domestic instructions by summarizing evidence of the criterion and accuracy of aspirin enteric-coated tablet instructions. Methods Systematic review was applied to identify instructions through foreign and domestic web/databases. Aspirin enteric-coated tablet instructions classified as OTC and produced during 2002~2013 were included. Results 82 copies were eligible and divided into low or high dose type according to the usage and specifications. In terms of domestic instructions, incorrect label of basic items was mainly in the non-safety information, contraindications and precautions, and low-dose instructions were not unified in indications, usage and dosage, etc. As for safety information, we found that two types all had inconsistency in indications, dosage and suitable crowd, and the difference in low dose was more obvious. Conclusion The quality of basic items in domestic instructions was acceptable, but the low-dose safety information was poorly administrated. Compared with others, domestic instructions lacked local researches and we should attach more importance to pediatric use.