中国微创外科杂志
中國微創外科雜誌
중국미창외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
2015年
6期
487-491,496
,共6页
尹刚%张能维%朱斌%阿民布和%闫巍%廉东坡%樊庆%刘晨%杜德晓%张东东%张振%张雁凯%宫轲
尹剛%張能維%硃斌%阿民佈和%閆巍%廉東坡%樊慶%劉晨%杜德曉%張東東%張振%張雁凱%宮軻
윤강%장능유%주빈%아민포화%염외%렴동파%번경%류신%두덕효%장동동%장진%장안개%궁가
肥胖病%减重手术%腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术%腹腔镜胃袖状切除术
肥胖病%減重手術%腹腔鏡Roux-en-Y胃徬路術%腹腔鏡胃袖狀切除術
비반병%감중수술%복강경Roux-en-Y위방로술%복강경위수상절제술
Obesity%Bariatric surgery%Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass%Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
目的比较腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,LRYGB)与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术( laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ,LSG)治疗肥胖病的疗效。方法2012年1月~2014年1月符合入组条件的肥胖病49例,术前BMI 38.85±6.40(32.01~58.64),其中42例(86%)合并2型糖尿病,37例(76%)合并高甘油三酯血症(hypertriglyceridemia,HTG)。根据患者选择的手术方式分为LRYGB组(n=26)和LSG组(n=23),将临床资料进行对比研究。结果2组均成功实施手术。 LRYGB组手术时间明显长于LSG组[(108.8±16.1) min vs.(90.9±24.8) min,t=3.031,P=0.004]。术后随访12~28个月,平均16个月。49例术后12个月BMI 29.75±3.46,与术前相比明显下降( t=14.135,P=0.000);术后多余体重减除率(EWL%)80.06%±14.28%(51.00%~120.00%)。42例合并2型糖尿病者术后空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白较术前明显下降[(9.23±3.40) mmol/L vs.(8.00±1.94) mmol/L,t =3.168,P=0.003;6.22%±1.63%vs.5.43%±0.93%,t=7.212,P=0.000];37例合并HTG患者术后甘油三酯水平较术前亦下降[(2.49±0.77) mmol/L vs.(1.64±0.68)mmol/L,t=5.202,P=0.000]。2组体重减轻、降糖、降脂效果无明显差异(P均>0.05)。结论LRYGB与LSG治疗肥胖病是安全有效的,对合并2型糖尿病及高甘油三酯血症也有较好的疗效。 LSG操作相对简单,符合胃肠道生理,值得优先选择。
目的比較腹腔鏡Roux-en-Y胃徬路術(laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,LRYGB)與腹腔鏡胃袖狀切除術( laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ,LSG)治療肥胖病的療效。方法2012年1月~2014年1月符閤入組條件的肥胖病49例,術前BMI 38.85±6.40(32.01~58.64),其中42例(86%)閤併2型糖尿病,37例(76%)閤併高甘油三酯血癥(hypertriglyceridemia,HTG)。根據患者選擇的手術方式分為LRYGB組(n=26)和LSG組(n=23),將臨床資料進行對比研究。結果2組均成功實施手術。 LRYGB組手術時間明顯長于LSG組[(108.8±16.1) min vs.(90.9±24.8) min,t=3.031,P=0.004]。術後隨訪12~28箇月,平均16箇月。49例術後12箇月BMI 29.75±3.46,與術前相比明顯下降( t=14.135,P=0.000);術後多餘體重減除率(EWL%)80.06%±14.28%(51.00%~120.00%)。42例閤併2型糖尿病者術後空腹血糖和糖化血紅蛋白較術前明顯下降[(9.23±3.40) mmol/L vs.(8.00±1.94) mmol/L,t =3.168,P=0.003;6.22%±1.63%vs.5.43%±0.93%,t=7.212,P=0.000];37例閤併HTG患者術後甘油三酯水平較術前亦下降[(2.49±0.77) mmol/L vs.(1.64±0.68)mmol/L,t=5.202,P=0.000]。2組體重減輕、降糖、降脂效果無明顯差異(P均>0.05)。結論LRYGB與LSG治療肥胖病是安全有效的,對閤併2型糖尿病及高甘油三酯血癥也有較好的療效。 LSG操作相對簡單,符閤胃腸道生理,值得優先選擇。
목적비교복강경Roux-en-Y위방로술(laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,LRYGB)여복강경위수상절제술( laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ,LSG)치료비반병적료효。방법2012년1월~2014년1월부합입조조건적비반병49례,술전BMI 38.85±6.40(32.01~58.64),기중42례(86%)합병2형당뇨병,37례(76%)합병고감유삼지혈증(hypertriglyceridemia,HTG)。근거환자선택적수술방식분위LRYGB조(n=26)화LSG조(n=23),장림상자료진행대비연구。결과2조균성공실시수술。 LRYGB조수술시간명현장우LSG조[(108.8±16.1) min vs.(90.9±24.8) min,t=3.031,P=0.004]。술후수방12~28개월,평균16개월。49례술후12개월BMI 29.75±3.46,여술전상비명현하강( t=14.135,P=0.000);술후다여체중감제솔(EWL%)80.06%±14.28%(51.00%~120.00%)。42례합병2형당뇨병자술후공복혈당화당화혈홍단백교술전명현하강[(9.23±3.40) mmol/L vs.(8.00±1.94) mmol/L,t =3.168,P=0.003;6.22%±1.63%vs.5.43%±0.93%,t=7.212,P=0.000];37례합병HTG환자술후감유삼지수평교술전역하강[(2.49±0.77) mmol/L vs.(1.64±0.68)mmol/L,t=5.202,P=0.000]。2조체중감경、강당、강지효과무명현차이(P균>0.05)。결론LRYGB여LSG치료비반병시안전유효적,대합병2형당뇨병급고감유삼지혈증야유교호적료효。 LSG조작상대간단,부합위장도생리,치득우선선택。
Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ( LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ( LSG) for the treatment of the obesity patients . Methods A total of 49 patients suffering from severe obesity were enrolled in this study in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014.The mean body mass index ( BMI) ranged 32.01-58.64 (38.85 ±6.40) before surgery.Among them, 42 (86%) patients had type 2 diabetes (DM2) and 37 (76%) patients had hypertriglyceridemia ( HTG) .The patients were divided into LRYGB group ( n =26 ) or LSG group ( n=23 ) based on patients ’ selection.Clinical data of the two group were compared . Results All the patients underwent surgery successfully .The average operating time in the LRYGB group was significantly longer than the LSG group [(108.8 ±16.1) min vs.(90.9 ±24.8) min, t=3.031, P=0.004)].The patients were followed up for 12-28 months, with an average period of 16 months.The BMI of all the patients was 29.75 ±3.46 at 12 months after surgery , which was decreased significantly than before the surgery ( t=14.135, P=0.000).The mean excess weight loss (EWL%) was 80.06%±14.28% (51.00%-120.00%) at 12 months after surgery.The average levels of fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) after surgery in 42 obesity patients with DM2 were lower than those before surgery [(9.23 ±3.40) mmol/L vs.(8.00 ±1.94) mmol/L, t=3.168, P=0.003;6.22%±1.63% vs. 5.43%±0.93%, t=7.212, P=0.000].The mean serum triglyceridein in 37 obesity patients with HTG was decreased after surgery as compared to that before surgery [(2.49 ±0.77) mmol/L vs.(1.64 ±0.68) mmol/L, t=5.202, P=0.000].There were no significant difference in the body weight loss , decrease of fasting blood sugar and serum triglyceride between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions LRYGB and LSG are safe and effective to treat the patients suffered from obesity , including patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertriglyceridemia .We recommend LSG as preferable choice of the surgical procedure considering simple performance as well as no change of digestive system .