CAJ | 학술논문

从优化目标、限制条件和优化方案的适用性等角度着重比较分析了从P‐M edian模型和截流选址模型3个基础模型发展而来的两类主流模型———点需求模型和路径流量需求模型的优点和缺点，详细阐述了各类模型的改进和延伸，进一步探索了多目标优化模型以及动态布局优化模型和方法。充电站布局具有独特的影响因素，需同时考虑电动汽车续驶里程短、充电时间长等特性引起的不确定性决策问题，以及长期建设过程中连续性优化等问题。结合传统布局优化研究的不足，提出了未来充电站布局的研究趋势和方向。
종우화목표、한제조건화우화방안적괄용성등각도착중비교분석료종P‐M edian모형화절류선지모형3개기출모형발전이래적량류주류모형———점수구모형화로경류량수구모형적우점화결점，상세천술료각류모형적개진화연신，진일보탐색료다목표우화모형이급동태포국우화모형화방법。충전참포국구유독특적영향인소，수동시고필전동기차속사리정단、충전시간장등특성인기적불학정성결책문제，이급장기건설과정중련속성우화등문제。결합전통포국우화연구적불족，제출료미래충전참포국적연구추세화방향。
From the view points of optimization objects , constraints and feasibility of optimization schemes ,the advantages and disadvantages of two mainstream models ,point‐based demand models and path‐based demand models ,based on two types of basic models ,P‐Mmedian Model and Flowing Capturing Location Model ,were compared and analyzed .The following improvement and extending models were elaborated .The multi‐objective optimization models and the dynamic modeling frame‐work were further explored .The location of recharging stations for Electric Vehicles (EVs) has some unique influence factors and some special requirements on both the decision uncertainties due to shor‐ter driving range and longer charging time and the continuity optimization issues in a long‐term con‐struction .Research focuses and directions in near future are proposed by considering the limitation of existing studies .