医学理论与实践
醫學理論與實踐
의학이론여실천
The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
2015年
10期
1276-1278
,共3页
细菌感染%降钙素原%C反应蛋白%疗效观察%预后判断
細菌感染%降鈣素原%C反應蛋白%療效觀察%預後判斷
세균감염%강개소원%C반응단백%료효관찰%예후판단
Bacterial infection%Procalcitonin%C-reactive protein%Clinical efficacy%Prognosis
目的：分析并评价联合检测降钙素原、C反应蛋白在细菌感染患者疗效观察及预后判断中的临床意义。方法：选取我院2013年5月－2014年5月收治的重症感染患者310例，局部感染患者310例和同期体格检查健康的志愿者310例，对所有研究对象血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白含量以及动态变化情况进行检测和比较。结果：重症感染组和局部感染组血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白含量明显增高；重症感染组和局部感染组血清降钙素原阳性率分别为96．13％、67．42％；C反应蛋白阳性率分别为87．42％、75．16％，与健康组比较差异有统计学意义，P＜0．05；两感染组血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白含量在治疗前、后差异具有统计学意义，P＜0．05。结论：联合检测降钙素原和C反应蛋白不仅能够显示出细菌感染的程度，还能够对治疗效果进行科学的评估，有利于对治疗方案进行指导，并协助判断病情的恢复情况，具有较高的临床应用价值。
目的：分析併評價聯閤檢測降鈣素原、C反應蛋白在細菌感染患者療效觀察及預後判斷中的臨床意義。方法：選取我院2013年5月－2014年5月收治的重癥感染患者310例，跼部感染患者310例和同期體格檢查健康的誌願者310例，對所有研究對象血清降鈣素原和C反應蛋白含量以及動態變化情況進行檢測和比較。結果：重癥感染組和跼部感染組血清降鈣素原和C反應蛋白含量明顯增高；重癥感染組和跼部感染組血清降鈣素原暘性率分彆為96．13％、67．42％；C反應蛋白暘性率分彆為87．42％、75．16％，與健康組比較差異有統計學意義，P＜0．05；兩感染組血清降鈣素原和C反應蛋白含量在治療前、後差異具有統計學意義，P＜0．05。結論：聯閤檢測降鈣素原和C反應蛋白不僅能夠顯示齣細菌感染的程度，還能夠對治療效果進行科學的評估，有利于對治療方案進行指導，併協助判斷病情的恢複情況，具有較高的臨床應用價值。
목적：분석병평개연합검측강개소원、C반응단백재세균감염환자료효관찰급예후판단중적림상의의。방법：선취아원2013년5월－2014년5월수치적중증감염환자310례，국부감염환자310례화동기체격검사건강적지원자310례，대소유연구대상혈청강개소원화C반응단백함량이급동태변화정황진행검측화비교。결과：중증감염조화국부감염조혈청강개소원화C반응단백함량명현증고；중증감염조화국부감염조혈청강개소원양성솔분별위96．13％、67．42％；C반응단백양성솔분별위87．42％、75．16％，여건강조비교차이유통계학의의，P＜0．05；량감염조혈청강개소원화C반응단백함량재치료전、후차이구유통계학의의，P＜0．05。결론：연합검측강개소원화C반응단백불부능구현시출세균감염적정도，환능구대치료효과진행과학적평고，유리우대치료방안진행지도，병협조판단병정적회복정황，구유교고적림상응용개치。
Objective:To analyze and evaluate the clinical significance of combined detecting procalcitonin ,C‐reactive protein in the therapeutic effect and prognosis of patients with bacterial infection .Methods:Selected 310 patients severe infection patients from May 2013 to May 2014 in our hospital ,310 patients with local infection patients and 310 healthy volunteers with physical examination of health ,their serum procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein content and dynamic change were detected and compared .Results:Serum procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein content of severe infection group and local infection group had increases;severe infection group and local infection group’s serum procalcitonin positive rates were 96 .13% and 67 .42% ;C‐reactive protein positive rates were 87 .42% and 75 .16% ,the difference was statistically significant compared with the control group ,P<0 .05 ;two groups’infection serum procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein content had difference before and after the treatment , P<0 .05 .Conclusion:Combined detection of procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein can not only show the extent of bacterial infection ,but also assess the treatment effect scientific ,it is beneficial to the guidance of the treatment plan ,and assist to determine the condition of recovery , it has high value in clinical application .
