CAJ | 학술논문

围绕违反《公司法》第16条的法律后果，理论界和实务界争论不断。无论是从规范性质角度，还是基于第16条的规范意义来认定违反第16条的公司担保合同的效力都是片面的。《公司法》第16条应当作为公司担保法律行为的直接裁判依据，而公司担保合同的效力问题应当通过解释和适用《担保法》、《合同法》等相关法律加以认定。
위요위반《공사법》제16조적법률후과，이론계화실무계쟁론불단。무론시종규범성질각도，환시기우제16조적규범의의래인정위반제16조적공사담보합동적효력도시편면적。《공사법》제16조응당작위공사담보법률행위적직접재판의거，이공사담보합동적효력문제응당통과해석화괄용《담보법》、《합동법》등상관법률가이인정。
The legal effect of violation of the sixteenth clause of the 2005 version of Corporate Law becomes one of the most debated is-sues both in theoretical cycle and practice cycle.It’ s one-sided to identify the legal effect of corporate guarantee behavior no matter in the situation of normative foundation or the purpose of the clause.The sixteenth clause should be the direct judicial basis for corporate guaran-tee behavior and the legal effect of guarantee contract should be identified through interpretation and application of Guarantee Law and Con-tract law.