CAJ | 학술논문

在通常的观点中，陆九渊是“心学”的开创者，王阳明是“心学”的集大成者，“陆王心学”常被并称之。但这种认识下的陆学遮蔽了象山对理的重视，掩盖了他以理限制心的真相。事实上，陆学确为理学。程朱理学与陆王心学的简单二分有问题，而理本论、气本论、心本论的三分也有问题。“主观唯心主义”与“心本论”有一脉相承之处，但仅以此脉络推说陆学，是很难说得通的。
재통상적관점중，륙구연시“심학”적개창자，왕양명시“심학”적집대성자，“륙왕심학”상피병칭지。단저충인식하적륙학차폐료상산대리적중시，엄개료타이리한제심적진상。사실상，륙학학위이학。정주이학여륙왕심학적간단이분유문제，이리본론、기본론、심본론적삼분야유문제。“주관유심주의”여“심본론”유일맥상승지처，단부이차맥락추설륙학，시흔난설득통적。
People think that Lu Jiuyuan was the pioneer of the Learning of Mind and Wang Yangming was the one who completed it.It is a common saying of“the Learning of Mind of Lu and Wang”.However, vie-wing Lu’ s leaning as the Learning of Mind covers his emphasis of Li ( Principle) and his using Li to con-strain mind.In reality, Lu’s learning is the learning of Li.The dichotomy of the learning of Li of Cheng and Zhu and the Learning of Mind of Lu and Wang is unreasonable, and the trichotomy of Ontology of Li, Ontol-ogy of Qi, Ontology of mind, is the same.It is a wrong way to study Lu’ s learning by subjective idealism and Ontology of mind.