临床误诊误治
臨床誤診誤治
림상오진오치
CLINICAL MISDIAGNOSIS & MISTHERAPY
2015年
6期
32-35
,共4页
赵国斌%李向东%唐玉红%孔雁萍%张秀梅%苗文隆%凌海滨%张潮
趙國斌%李嚮東%唐玉紅%孔雁萍%張秀梅%苗文隆%凌海濱%張潮
조국빈%리향동%당옥홍%공안평%장수매%묘문륭%릉해빈%장조
肾肿瘤%腹腔镜检查%肾部分切除术%手助腹腔镜检查
腎腫瘤%腹腔鏡檢查%腎部分切除術%手助腹腔鏡檢查
신종류%복강경검사%신부분절제술%수조복강경검사
Kidney neoplasm%Laparoscopy%Partial nephrectomy%Hand-Assisted laparoscopy
目的:观察肾肿瘤后腹腔镜肾部分切除术转手助腹腔镜手术的临床效果。方法选择2009年2月—2013年2月由单一术者完成的肾肿瘤后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中因粘连、出血、肿瘤位置复杂等原因改变术式的27例,随机分为手助腹腔镜组14例、开腹手术组13例,观察比较两组手术时间、出血量、切口长度、术后下床活动时间、住院时间、肾缺血时间等指标及并发症发生情况、预后,并比较两组C反应蛋白(CRP)及白细胞介素6(IL-6)浓度变化。结果本研究27例均顺利完成手术,手助腹腔镜组手术时间、出血量、切口长度、下床活动时间、住院时间均明显少于开腹手术组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05);肾脏热缺血时间较开腹手术组稍长,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1、3 d两组CRP及IL-6浓度均显著高于术前,但手助腹腔组术后CRP、IL-6浓度显著低于开腹手术组(P<0.01)。开腹手术组1例损伤腔静脉,术中修复,两组均无术后并发症发生。两组术后随访10~58个月,未发现肿瘤局部复发。结论肾肿瘤后腹腔镜肾部分切除术转手助腹腔镜手术创伤小、出血少、恢复快,安全可靠。
目的:觀察腎腫瘤後腹腔鏡腎部分切除術轉手助腹腔鏡手術的臨床效果。方法選擇2009年2月—2013年2月由單一術者完成的腎腫瘤後腹腔鏡腎部分切除術中因粘連、齣血、腫瘤位置複雜等原因改變術式的27例,隨機分為手助腹腔鏡組14例、開腹手術組13例,觀察比較兩組手術時間、齣血量、切口長度、術後下床活動時間、住院時間、腎缺血時間等指標及併髮癥髮生情況、預後,併比較兩組C反應蛋白(CRP)及白細胞介素6(IL-6)濃度變化。結果本研究27例均順利完成手術,手助腹腔鏡組手術時間、齣血量、切口長度、下床活動時間、住院時間均明顯少于開腹手術組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01,P<0.05);腎髒熱缺血時間較開腹手術組稍長,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。術後1、3 d兩組CRP及IL-6濃度均顯著高于術前,但手助腹腔組術後CRP、IL-6濃度顯著低于開腹手術組(P<0.01)。開腹手術組1例損傷腔靜脈,術中脩複,兩組均無術後併髮癥髮生。兩組術後隨訪10~58箇月,未髮現腫瘤跼部複髮。結論腎腫瘤後腹腔鏡腎部分切除術轉手助腹腔鏡手術創傷小、齣血少、恢複快,安全可靠。
목적:관찰신종류후복강경신부분절제술전수조복강경수술적림상효과。방법선택2009년2월—2013년2월유단일술자완성적신종류후복강경신부분절제술중인점련、출혈、종류위치복잡등원인개변술식적27례,수궤분위수조복강경조14례、개복수술조13례,관찰비교량조수술시간、출혈량、절구장도、술후하상활동시간、주원시간、신결혈시간등지표급병발증발생정황、예후,병비교량조C반응단백(CRP)급백세포개소6(IL-6)농도변화。결과본연구27례균순리완성수술,수조복강경조수술시간、출혈량、절구장도、하상활동시간、주원시간균명현소우개복수술조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01,P<0.05);신장열결혈시간교개복수술조초장,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。술후1、3 d량조CRP급IL-6농도균현저고우술전,단수조복강조술후CRP、IL-6농도현저저우개복수술조(P<0.01)。개복수술조1례손상강정맥,술중수복,량조균무술후병발증발생。량조술후수방10~58개월,미발현종류국부복발。결론신종류후복강경신부분절제술전수조복강경수술창상소、출혈소、회복쾌,안전가고。
Objective To observe the clinical results of hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy converted from retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Methods During 2009 Feb. And 2013 Feb. , 27 patients underwent retroperitoneal lapa-roscopy partial nephrectomy, and operative style conversion for adhesion, bleeding, complex tumor location, etc. Randomly divided into two groups, 14 cases were converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic, and 13 to open surgeries. The tumor sizes , surgery time, loss of blood, incision length, off bed time, postoperative hospital stay, and renal ischemia time, prognosis, and concentration of CRP and IL-6 were compare. Results All the 27 operations were performed successfully. The surgery time, bleeding amount, incision length and off bed time of hand-assisted laparoscopic group were all less than that of open sur-gery group(P<0. 01 or P<0. 05);but renal ischemia time was longer than that of open surgery group, and the differences showed no statistical significance( P>0. 05 ) . The concentration of CRP and IL-6 on postoperative 1 d and 3 d of the two groups were significantly higher than the preoperative level(P<0. 01), but The concentration of CRP and IL-6 post-operation of hand assisted laparoscopic group were significantly lower than that of open surgery group (P<0. 01). In the open operation group there was 1 case of vena cava injury, and after intraoperative repair, patients of two groups had no complications after. Two groups were followed up for 10-58 months, no recurrence was found. Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopy partial ne-phrectomy converted into hand-assisted laparoscopic is less invasive with less loss of blood but a quicker recovery.