中国药物应用与监测
中國藥物應用與鑑測
중국약물응용여감측
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DRUG APPLICATION AND MONITORING
2015年
3期
133-136
,共4页
张渝%陶海涛%汪进良%马俊勋%董伟伟%胡毅
張渝%陶海濤%汪進良%馬俊勛%董偉偉%鬍毅
장투%도해도%왕진량%마준훈%동위위%호의
替莫唑胺%全脑放疗%脑转移%肺癌
替莫唑胺%全腦放療%腦轉移%肺癌
체막서알%전뇌방료%뇌전이%폐암
Temozolomide%Whole brain radiotherapy%Brain metastases%Lung cancer
目的:评价替莫唑胺联合同步全脑放疗对肺癌脑转移患者的有效性和安全性。方法:收集替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗肺癌脑转移患者24例,全脑放疗总剂量40 Gy,2 Gy/次,5次/周。全脑放疗后,对部分局部病灶三维适形局部加量至50~60 Gy。所有患者于放疗第1天开始给予替莫唑胺75 mg·m-2口服治疗,直至放疗结束,如有不良反应不可耐受则停用化疗药。后续根据患者的系统治疗和耐受情况,患者在放疗结束后接受系统化疗或继续替莫唑胺辅助治疗(150~200 mg·m-2·d-1,5/28天),最多行6周期辅助治疗,评价患者的疗效与不良反应。结果:24例患者全部完成颅脑的同步放化疗,10例患者接受个体化选择的系统化疗,7例接受最佳支持治疗,3例患者接受4个周期替莫唑胺辅助治疗,3例患者接受了6周期辅助治疗。放化疗结束后颅内病灶评价:完全缓解2例,部分缓解7例,稳定12例,进展3例,总有效率37.5%,疾病控制率87.5%,中位PFS为5个月,中位颅内病灶PFS为6个月。18例患者出现治疗相关不良反应,其中3例(12.5%)出现Ⅲ~Ⅳ度血液学毒性反应。4例(16.7%)出现Ⅲ~Ⅳ度非血液学毒性反应。结论:替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗肺癌脑转移疗效较满意,不良反应可耐受,治疗依从性较好,远期生存获益仍需进一步的临床研究予以验证。
目的:評價替莫唑胺聯閤同步全腦放療對肺癌腦轉移患者的有效性和安全性。方法:收集替莫唑胺聯閤全腦放療治療肺癌腦轉移患者24例,全腦放療總劑量40 Gy,2 Gy/次,5次/週。全腦放療後,對部分跼部病竈三維適形跼部加量至50~60 Gy。所有患者于放療第1天開始給予替莫唑胺75 mg·m-2口服治療,直至放療結束,如有不良反應不可耐受則停用化療藥。後續根據患者的繫統治療和耐受情況,患者在放療結束後接受繫統化療或繼續替莫唑胺輔助治療(150~200 mg·m-2·d-1,5/28天),最多行6週期輔助治療,評價患者的療效與不良反應。結果:24例患者全部完成顱腦的同步放化療,10例患者接受箇體化選擇的繫統化療,7例接受最佳支持治療,3例患者接受4箇週期替莫唑胺輔助治療,3例患者接受瞭6週期輔助治療。放化療結束後顱內病竈評價:完全緩解2例,部分緩解7例,穩定12例,進展3例,總有效率37.5%,疾病控製率87.5%,中位PFS為5箇月,中位顱內病竈PFS為6箇月。18例患者齣現治療相關不良反應,其中3例(12.5%)齣現Ⅲ~Ⅳ度血液學毒性反應。4例(16.7%)齣現Ⅲ~Ⅳ度非血液學毒性反應。結論:替莫唑胺聯閤全腦放療治療肺癌腦轉移療效較滿意,不良反應可耐受,治療依從性較好,遠期生存穫益仍需進一步的臨床研究予以驗證。
목적:평개체막서알연합동보전뇌방료대폐암뇌전이환자적유효성화안전성。방법:수집체막서알연합전뇌방료치료폐암뇌전이환자24례,전뇌방료총제량40 Gy,2 Gy/차,5차/주。전뇌방료후,대부분국부병조삼유괄형국부가량지50~60 Gy。소유환자우방료제1천개시급여체막서알75 mg·m-2구복치료,직지방료결속,여유불량반응불가내수칙정용화료약。후속근거환자적계통치료화내수정황,환자재방료결속후접수계통화료혹계속체막서알보조치료(150~200 mg·m-2·d-1,5/28천),최다행6주기보조치료,평개환자적료효여불량반응。결과:24례환자전부완성로뇌적동보방화료,10례환자접수개체화선택적계통화료,7례접수최가지지치료,3례환자접수4개주기체막서알보조치료,3례환자접수료6주기보조치료。방화료결속후로내병조평개:완전완해2례,부분완해7례,은정12례,진전3례,총유효솔37.5%,질병공제솔87.5%,중위PFS위5개월,중위로내병조PFS위6개월。18례환자출현치료상관불량반응,기중3례(12.5%)출현Ⅲ~Ⅳ도혈액학독성반응。4례(16.7%)출현Ⅲ~Ⅳ도비혈액학독성반응。결론:체막서알연합전뇌방료치료폐암뇌전이료효교만의,불량반응가내수,치료의종성교호,원기생존획익잉수진일보적림상연구여이험증。
Objective:To assess the efifcacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with whole brain radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer patients with brain metastases.Methods:A total of 24 lung cancer patients with brain metastases were enrolled in this retrospective study. The whole brain radiotherapy with the total dose of 40 Gy (2 Gy per time, 5 times per week) was given to all the patients, and another 10–20 Gy of intensity-modulated boosting therapy for local lesion was given if necessary. All patients took temozolomide (75 mg·m-2) concurrently during the whole course of radiotherapy. Temozolomide should be stopped, if the patient can not tolerate adverse reactions. After radiotherapy, the patients received systematical chemotherapy or continued TMZ therapy (150–200 mg·m-2·d-1, 5/28 d) for additional 0–6 cycles according to the condition of the patients. The efifcacy and adverse reactions were evaluated statistically.Results:All the patients ifnished the radiotherapy combined with concurrent TMZ. Afterwards, 10 patients received systematical chemotherapy, 7 patients received the best supportive treatment, 3 patients received additional 4 cycles of TMZ adjuvant therapy, and 3 patients continued 6 cycles of TMZ chemotherapy. After radiotherapy and chemotherapy, 2 patients had complete response, 7 patients had partial response, 12 patients had stable disease, while the other 3 patients had progressed disease by evaluation of intracranial lesion. Therefore, the total effective rate achieved 37.5%, the disease control rate obtained 87.5%, the median PFS was 5 months, the median intracranial lesions PFS was 6 months. Acute side-effects were developed in 18 patients. GradeⅢorⅣhematologic toxicities were developed in 3 patients (12.5%), but gradeⅢ–Ⅳnon-hematologic side-effects were developed in 4 patients (16.7%).Conclusion:Temozolomide was well tolerant, and showed signiifcant improvements in response rate when combined with whole brain radiotherapy in lung cancer with brain metastases. While, the beneift of long-term survival needs to be veriifed by further clinical studies.