中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
15期
170-172
,共3页
系统护理%急性心肌梗死%效果评价
繫統護理%急性心肌梗死%效果評價
계통호리%급성심기경사%효과평개
System nursing%Acute myocardial infarction%Effect observation
目的:探讨系统护理在急性心肌梗死患者中的效果。方法选择2012年3月~2014年4月来本院就诊的120例3 h内发病的心肌梗死患者作为研究对象,根据护理方法的不同,将所有患者按随机抽样的方法分为实验组和对照组,对照组接受常规护理干预,实验组在对照组基础上接受系统化综合护理干预。统计比较两组住院时间、住院费用,及患者住院期间对护理工作的评价,观察记录所有患者的并发症情况。结果不同护理干预下,实验组总满意度为100.0%,对照组总满意度为81.7%;实验组住院时间短于对照组,住院费用明显少于对照组;实验组患者发生心绞痛的人数为8例,发病率为13.3%;对照组患者发生心绞痛的人数为21例,发病率为35%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论系统护理干预较常规护理在急性心肌梗死患者中的效果好,值得推广。
目的:探討繫統護理在急性心肌梗死患者中的效果。方法選擇2012年3月~2014年4月來本院就診的120例3 h內髮病的心肌梗死患者作為研究對象,根據護理方法的不同,將所有患者按隨機抽樣的方法分為實驗組和對照組,對照組接受常規護理榦預,實驗組在對照組基礎上接受繫統化綜閤護理榦預。統計比較兩組住院時間、住院費用,及患者住院期間對護理工作的評價,觀察記錄所有患者的併髮癥情況。結果不同護理榦預下,實驗組總滿意度為100.0%,對照組總滿意度為81.7%;實驗組住院時間短于對照組,住院費用明顯少于對照組;實驗組患者髮生心絞痛的人數為8例,髮病率為13.3%;對照組患者髮生心絞痛的人數為21例,髮病率為35%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論繫統護理榦預較常規護理在急性心肌梗死患者中的效果好,值得推廣。
목적:탐토계통호리재급성심기경사환자중적효과。방법선택2012년3월~2014년4월래본원취진적120례3 h내발병적심기경사환자작위연구대상,근거호리방법적불동,장소유환자안수궤추양적방법분위실험조화대조조,대조조접수상규호리간예,실험조재대조조기출상접수계통화종합호리간예。통계비교량조주원시간、주원비용,급환자주원기간대호리공작적평개,관찰기록소유환자적병발증정황。결과불동호리간예하,실험조총만의도위100.0%,대조조총만의도위81.7%;실험조주원시간단우대조조,주원비용명현소우대조조;실험조환자발생심교통적인수위8례,발병솔위13.3%;대조조환자발생심교통적인수위21례,발병솔위35%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론계통호리간예교상규호리재급성심기경사환자중적효과호,치득추엄。
Objective To study the effect of system nursing intervention on patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction. Methods According to the different treatment methods,120 selected acute myocardial infarction cases in our hospital from March 2012 to April 2014 were randomly divided into two groups,control group and treatment group,with 60 cases in each group.Control group were received routine nursing and treatment group were received system nursing intervention.Assess the treatment effect and hospitalization time and hospital costs. Results After different treatments, the satisfaction in treatment group was 100.0%,and that in control group was 81.7%;hospitalization time and hospital costs in treatment group was significantly less than that in control group respectively.The incidence of angina in treat-ment group was 13.3% and that in control group was 35%. Conclusion The system nursing intervention on patients with acute myocardial infarction can produce better than routine nursing in prevention of angina.It is worthy of clinical use and promotion.