中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2015年
16期
16-17,18
,共3页
股骨偏心距%全髋关节置换术%髋关节功能
股骨偏心距%全髖關節置換術%髖關節功能
고골편심거%전관관절치환술%관관절공능
Femoral offset%Total hip arthroplasty%Hip joint function
目的:通过临床资料收集明确股骨偏心距对髋关节置换术后的影响。方法以69例全髋关节置换术患者作为研究对象,根据置换术后术侧与健侧偏心距差值分为三组,分组依据是手术侧股骨偏心距和非手术侧股骨偏心距的差值。比较三组股骨柄及股骨头假体类型,并且于手术前后用各项评分系统对患者的临床表现进行SF-12量表、WOMAC及Harris评分。结果在假体类型方面得出:该手术中使用标准偏心距股骨柄假体为大多数,扩展偏心距股骨柄假体次之,减少偏心距股骨柄假体最少;三组之间的差异无统计学意义。三组实验患者均获随访,并且术后1年对三组间患者的SF-12量表评分比较,结果显示无显著性差异(P>0.05);WOMAC评分中,躯体功能评分之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。髋关节功能根据Harris评分标准,得三组间优良率存在显著性差异。结论在人工全髋关节置换术中,适宜的增大偏心距有利于术后关节疼痛的缓解以及功能恢复,偏心距减小可能会导致术后关节疼痛加重以及功能减退。
目的:通過臨床資料收集明確股骨偏心距對髖關節置換術後的影響。方法以69例全髖關節置換術患者作為研究對象,根據置換術後術側與健側偏心距差值分為三組,分組依據是手術側股骨偏心距和非手術側股骨偏心距的差值。比較三組股骨柄及股骨頭假體類型,併且于手術前後用各項評分繫統對患者的臨床錶現進行SF-12量錶、WOMAC及Harris評分。結果在假體類型方麵得齣:該手術中使用標準偏心距股骨柄假體為大多數,擴展偏心距股骨柄假體次之,減少偏心距股骨柄假體最少;三組之間的差異無統計學意義。三組實驗患者均穫隨訪,併且術後1年對三組間患者的SF-12量錶評分比較,結果顯示無顯著性差異(P>0.05);WOMAC評分中,軀體功能評分之間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。髖關節功能根據Harris評分標準,得三組間優良率存在顯著性差異。結論在人工全髖關節置換術中,適宜的增大偏心距有利于術後關節疼痛的緩解以及功能恢複,偏心距減小可能會導緻術後關節疼痛加重以及功能減退。
목적:통과림상자료수집명학고골편심거대관관절치환술후적영향。방법이69례전관관절치환술환자작위연구대상,근거치환술후술측여건측편심거차치분위삼조,분조의거시수술측고골편심거화비수술측고골편심거적차치。비교삼조고골병급고골두가체류형,병차우수술전후용각항평분계통대환자적림상표현진행SF-12량표、WOMAC급Harris평분。결과재가체류형방면득출:해수술중사용표준편심거고골병가체위대다수,확전편심거고골병가체차지,감소편심거고골병가체최소;삼조지간적차이무통계학의의。삼조실험환자균획수방,병차술후1년대삼조간환자적SF-12량표평분비교,결과현시무현저성차이(P>0.05);WOMAC평분중,구체공능평분지간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관관절공능근거Harris평분표준,득삼조간우량솔존재현저성차이。결론재인공전관관절치환술중,괄의적증대편심거유리우술후관절동통적완해이급공능회복,편심거감소가능회도치술후관절동통가중이급공능감퇴。
Objective Analyze the The effects of altering patients’ femoral offset (FO) during total hip arthroplasty on postoperative pain and function. Methods This study compared clinical outcomes as assessed by the Short Form 12 Health Survey, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Harris between patients who had their FOs restored to varying degrees (compared to the contralateral normal hip [CL]). We retrospectively measured postoperative FOs on standard anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and compared to the CL. Patients were categorized into one of 3 groups:decreased offset (N?4 mm compared to CL), normal offset (between?4 and+4 mm), and increased offset (N+4mm). Results According to the results of the Short Form 12 Health Survey, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Harris, there are signiifcant differences between these three groups. The decreased offset group’s physical Function scores that were less than those of the normal offset and increased offset groups. In conclusion, reducing a patients’ native FO led to inferior functional outcome scores. Conclusions Increase in total hip arthroplasty, eccentricity is conducive to the postoperative joint pain relief and functional recovery, eccentricity reduce postoperative joint pain may lead to aggravate and functional impairment.