干旱地区农业研究
榦旱地區農業研究
간한지구농업연구
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE ARID AREAS
2015年
3期
96-103
,共8页
范富%侯迷红%张庆国%苏雅乐%彭靖
範富%侯迷紅%張慶國%囌雅樂%彭靖
범부%후미홍%장경국%소아악%팽정
保水剂%土壤质地%土壤含水量%土壤水吸力%持水性%供水性
保水劑%土壤質地%土壤含水量%土壤水吸力%持水性%供水性
보수제%토양질지%토양함수량%토양수흡력%지수성%공수성
super absorbent polymer (SAP )%soil texture%soil moisture content%soil water suction%soil moisture retention properties%water supply properties
通过盆栽试验,对保水剂在砂土、壤土和粘土上的保水效果进行了研究,结果表明:(1)对于土壤水吸力变化而言,沙土、壤土分别添加保水剂(SAP )5 g和10 g (即处理B5和B10)均低于不添加SAP (处理B0),但随着SAP用量的增加,水吸力并没有表现出减小的趋势,沙土均<30.4 kPa ,壤土均<80 kPa;粘土在低水吸力范围内与砂土、壤土相似,>30 kPa各处理效果不明显。(2)对于土壤含水量而言,沙土的B10处理在含水量上显著高于其它处理,然而综合考虑水吸力和含水量时,沙土在<15 kPa水吸力范围内,B10处理虽供水性较强,但土壤持水性变差,B1处理持水性较好,供水性在作物可利用范围内;壤土的处理效果不如沙土,壤土在同一水吸力下,处理B5含水量始终处于较高水平,均高于19%,且在<30 kPa的吸力范围有较高的持水性和供水性;粘土土壤水吸力与含水量二者的关系相对比较复杂,B5处理在不同吸力范围内出现相反的保水效果,其机理有待进一步研究。
通過盆栽試驗,對保水劑在砂土、壤土和粘土上的保水效果進行瞭研究,結果錶明:(1)對于土壤水吸力變化而言,沙土、壤土分彆添加保水劑(SAP )5 g和10 g (即處理B5和B10)均低于不添加SAP (處理B0),但隨著SAP用量的增加,水吸力併沒有錶現齣減小的趨勢,沙土均<30.4 kPa ,壤土均<80 kPa;粘土在低水吸力範圍內與砂土、壤土相似,>30 kPa各處理效果不明顯。(2)對于土壤含水量而言,沙土的B10處理在含水量上顯著高于其它處理,然而綜閤攷慮水吸力和含水量時,沙土在<15 kPa水吸力範圍內,B10處理雖供水性較彊,但土壤持水性變差,B1處理持水性較好,供水性在作物可利用範圍內;壤土的處理效果不如沙土,壤土在同一水吸力下,處理B5含水量始終處于較高水平,均高于19%,且在<30 kPa的吸力範圍有較高的持水性和供水性;粘土土壤水吸力與含水量二者的關繫相對比較複雜,B5處理在不同吸力範圍內齣現相反的保水效果,其機理有待進一步研究。
통과분재시험,대보수제재사토、양토화점토상적보수효과진행료연구,결과표명:(1)대우토양수흡력변화이언,사토、양토분별첨가보수제(SAP )5 g화10 g (즉처리B5화B10)균저우불첨가SAP (처리B0),단수착SAP용량적증가,수흡력병몰유표현출감소적추세,사토균<30.4 kPa ,양토균<80 kPa;점토재저수흡력범위내여사토、양토상사,>30 kPa각처리효과불명현。(2)대우토양함수량이언,사토적B10처리재함수량상현저고우기타처리,연이종합고필수흡력화함수량시,사토재<15 kPa수흡력범위내,B10처리수공수성교강,단토양지수성변차,B1처리지수성교호,공수성재작물가이용범위내;양토적처리효과불여사토,양토재동일수흡력하,처리B5함수량시종처우교고수평,균고우19%,차재<30 kPa적흡력범위유교고적지수성화공수성;점토토양수흡력여함수량이자적관계상대비교복잡,B5처리재불동흡력범위내출현상반적보수효과,기궤리유대진일보연구。
The effects of super absorbent polymer (SAP) in different texture soils (sand ,loam and clay) were stud-ied through the pot experiments .The results showed that :(1 ) For the change of soil water suction ,the treatments as B5 (added 5 g of SAP)and B10(added 10 g of SAP)were total lower than the CK as B0 without SAP in sand and loam soils . But with the increase of SAP ,the water suction was not showed the reduce trend ,for the sand soil it was total<30 .4 kPa and for the loam soil it was total<80 kPa .The clay soil was showed the similar change of sand soil within the lower scope of water suction .The effect of each treatment was showed not obvious when the water suction was more than 30 kPa . (2 ) For the soil moisture content ,the treatment as B10 of sandy soil was significantly higher than other treatments . However ,when comprehensively considered the water suction and water content ,though the soil moisture supply proper-ties was stronger for the treatment as B10 in sand soil less than 15 kPa of water suction ,but the soil moisture retention property was become poor .For the treatment as B1 ,the water retention property was rather good ,soil moisture supply property was kept in water available scope for crop .The effect of treatment for loam soil was less than the sand soil ,un-der the same water suction of loam soil ,the water content of treatment as B5 was throughout at the high level ,total was>19% ,also showed rather high soil moisture retention and water supply properties at less than 30 kPa .Both the rela-tionships of soil water suction and water content in clay soil was relatively complex .The treatment as B5 was showed in opposite effects of water retention property at different water suction range , its mechanism was needed for further re-search .