中国CT和MRI杂志
中國CT和MRI雜誌
중국CT화MRI잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CT AND MRI
2015年
7期
69-71
,共3页
肝癌%介入治疗%磁共振弥散加权成像
肝癌%介入治療%磁共振瀰散加權成像
간암%개입치료%자공진미산가권성상
Liver Cancer%Interventional Therapy%Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging
目的:探讨磁共振弥散加权成像技术在肝癌介入治疗中的应用价值。方法以我院放射科收治的32例行介入治疗的肝癌患者为研究对象,根据其临床资料进行回顾性分析和总结,分别在其介入治疗前和介入治疗后7天对其进行常规平扫和磁共振弥散加权成像扫描,观察患者的影像学特征,并比较不同扩散敏感梯度值(b值)下的ADC值。结果治疗前患者的肿瘤体积为(204.93±122.89)cm3,治疗后下降到(145.37±117.26)cm3,治疗后的肿瘤体积明显低于治疗前,p<0.05,差异显著;b值为50、100时其治疗前后的ADC值没有显著差异,而当b值为300、500、700时治疗前后的ADC值存在显著差异(p<0.05)。结论磁共振弥散加权成像技术在肝癌介入治疗中的应用价值较高,其影像具有一定的特征性,可以反映肿瘤形态的微小变化,观察患者介入治疗后肿瘤血管密度等病理变化情况,对其治疗效果进行评定,具有较高的临床应用推广价值。
目的:探討磁共振瀰散加權成像技術在肝癌介入治療中的應用價值。方法以我院放射科收治的32例行介入治療的肝癌患者為研究對象,根據其臨床資料進行迴顧性分析和總結,分彆在其介入治療前和介入治療後7天對其進行常規平掃和磁共振瀰散加權成像掃描,觀察患者的影像學特徵,併比較不同擴散敏感梯度值(b值)下的ADC值。結果治療前患者的腫瘤體積為(204.93±122.89)cm3,治療後下降到(145.37±117.26)cm3,治療後的腫瘤體積明顯低于治療前,p<0.05,差異顯著;b值為50、100時其治療前後的ADC值沒有顯著差異,而噹b值為300、500、700時治療前後的ADC值存在顯著差異(p<0.05)。結論磁共振瀰散加權成像技術在肝癌介入治療中的應用價值較高,其影像具有一定的特徵性,可以反映腫瘤形態的微小變化,觀察患者介入治療後腫瘤血管密度等病理變化情況,對其治療效果進行評定,具有較高的臨床應用推廣價值。
목적:탐토자공진미산가권성상기술재간암개입치료중적응용개치。방법이아원방사과수치적32례행개입치료적간암환자위연구대상,근거기림상자료진행회고성분석화총결,분별재기개입치료전화개입치료후7천대기진행상규평소화자공진미산가권성상소묘,관찰환자적영상학특정,병비교불동확산민감제도치(b치)하적ADC치。결과치료전환자적종류체적위(204.93±122.89)cm3,치료후하강도(145.37±117.26)cm3,치료후적종류체적명현저우치료전,p<0.05,차이현저;b치위50、100시기치료전후적ADC치몰유현저차이,이당b치위300、500、700시치료전후적ADC치존재현저차이(p<0.05)。결론자공진미산가권성상기술재간암개입치료중적응용개치교고,기영상구유일정적특정성,가이반영종류형태적미소변화,관찰환자개입치료후종류혈관밀도등병리변화정황,대기치료효과진행평정,구유교고적림상응용추엄개치。
Objective This Paper is to investigate the application value of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging in interventional therapy of liver cancer. Methods Thirty two patients with liver cancer admitted by the Radiology Department of the Hospital undergoing interventional treatment of liver cancer patients were selected as research objects, who were retrospectively analyzed and summarized according to clinical data, those patients underwent routine scanning and magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging scanning respectively before interventional treatment and 7 days after interventional treatment, imaging characteristics of patients were observe, and ADC indexes under different diffusion sensitive gradient values (b) were compared. Results The gross tumor volume of patients before treatment 204.93+/-122.89cm3, and it fell to 145.37+117.26cm2 after treatment, the gross tumor volume of patients after treatment was significantly lower than that of patients before treatment (p<0.05), and differences were significant. There was no significant difference in ADC indexes before and after the treatment when the value of b hit 50 and 100, and there were significant differences in ADC indexes before and after the treatment when the value of b hit 300, 500 and 700 (p<0.05). Conclusions Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging deliver great value in interventional therapy of liver cancer, its images deliver certain characteristics, insignificant changes in the form of tumor may be reflected, and pathological change in tumor vascular density of patients may be observed, and the evaluation on treatment efficacy is of high application and promotion value in clinical practices.