现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2015年
4期
16-18
,共3页
三腔二囊管%牵引%护理
三腔二囊管%牽引%護理
삼강이낭관%견인%호리
three-way two-capsule%traction%nursing
目的:探讨两种不同牵引方法对三腔二囊管压迫止血术的效果观察。方法选择2013年2月~2014年1月本科住院行三腔二囊管压迫止血的31例患者设为实验组,选择2012年1~12月在本科住院行三腔二囊管压迫止血的32例患者设为对照组,实验组采用改良方法进行牵引,对照组采用传统方法进行牵引,对两组患者置管24 h内的压迫止血有效率及置管期间发生鼻黏膜损伤情况进行对比。结果两组患者置管24 h内止血有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组置管期间鼻黏膜损伤情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),实验组鼻黏膜损伤轻于对照组。结论改良的三腔二囊管牵引压迫止血术与传统方法达到同等有效的止血效果,且降低患者鼻黏膜损伤,减轻患者痛苦,适于临床应用。
目的:探討兩種不同牽引方法對三腔二囊管壓迫止血術的效果觀察。方法選擇2013年2月~2014年1月本科住院行三腔二囊管壓迫止血的31例患者設為實驗組,選擇2012年1~12月在本科住院行三腔二囊管壓迫止血的32例患者設為對照組,實驗組採用改良方法進行牽引,對照組採用傳統方法進行牽引,對兩組患者置管24 h內的壓迫止血有效率及置管期間髮生鼻黏膜損傷情況進行對比。結果兩組患者置管24 h內止血有效率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),兩組置管期間鼻黏膜損傷情況比較,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),實驗組鼻黏膜損傷輕于對照組。結論改良的三腔二囊管牽引壓迫止血術與傳統方法達到同等有效的止血效果,且降低患者鼻黏膜損傷,減輕患者痛苦,適于臨床應用。
목적:탐토량충불동견인방법대삼강이낭관압박지혈술적효과관찰。방법선택2013년2월~2014년1월본과주원행삼강이낭관압박지혈적31례환자설위실험조,선택2012년1~12월재본과주원행삼강이낭관압박지혈적32례환자설위대조조,실험조채용개량방법진행견인,대조조채용전통방법진행견인,대량조환자치관24 h내적압박지혈유효솔급치관기간발생비점막손상정황진행대비。결과량조환자치관24 h내지혈유효솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),량조치관기간비점막손상정황비교,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),실험조비점막손상경우대조조。결론개량적삼강이낭관견인압박지혈술여전통방법체도동등유효적지혈효과,차강저환자비점막손상,감경환자통고,괄우림상응용。
Objective To explore the effect of two traction ways of two-capsule compression on hemostasis. Methods Thirty-one hospitalized patients with compression hemostasis from February to January 2014 were set as the experiment group. Another thirty-two hospitalized patients from January 2012 to December 2012 were set as the control group. The control group was treated with traction of compression homeostasis in the traditional way, while the experiment group by the improved way. The two groups were compared in terms of the rate of effective compression hemostasis and the incidence of nasal membranes injury within 24 hours. Result The rate of the effective compression hemostasis within 24 h was not statistically different between the groups (P>0.05), but the incidence of nasal membranes injury was statistically different between them (P<0.05), the experiment group was less than that of the control group. Conclusion Improved traction of compression hemostasis is effective. It reduces the incidence of nasal membrane injury and pain so that it is worth clinical application.