临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2015年
12期
1037-1039
,共3页
王振涛%韩玉龙%李彦平
王振濤%韓玉龍%李彥平
왕진도%한옥룡%리언평
腰椎间盘突出%椎管狭窄症%椎旁神经阻滞%臭氧
腰椎間盤突齣%椎管狹窄癥%椎徬神經阻滯%臭氧
요추간반돌출%추관협착증%추방신경조체%취양
Lumber disc herniation%Lumber spinal canal stenosis%Paravertebral block%Ozone
目的:观察椎旁神经阻滞复合臭氧治疗腰椎间盘突出的远期临床疗效。方法90例经临床诊断证实为腰椎间盘突出合并椎管狭窄症患者随机分为两组:A组(n=45)单纯经椎旁间隙穿刺成功后注入消炎镇痛药20 ml;B组(n=45)经椎旁间隙穿刺成功后注入消炎镇痛药20 ml+40μg/ml臭氧10 ml;每周一次,3~4次为一疗程。对病人治疗后1个月、6个月的疗效进行随访观察,项目包括:①临床疼痛评价:采用疼痛视觉模拟评分法( VAS)进行评估;②治疗有效率:采用改良的MacNab法评价疗效。结果①VAS疼痛评分:两组组内比较,A组治疗后6个月的疼痛评分高于1个月的评分数值,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。组间比较,B组治疗后6个月临床疗效稳定性高于A组,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。②治疗总有效率:两组组内比较,A组治疗后6个月的治疗总有效率低于1个月的评分数值,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。组间比较显示,B组治疗后6个月治疗总有效率高于A组,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。结论椎旁神经阻滞复合臭氧治疗腰椎间盘突出的远期临床稳定性效果明显。
目的:觀察椎徬神經阻滯複閤臭氧治療腰椎間盤突齣的遠期臨床療效。方法90例經臨床診斷證實為腰椎間盤突齣閤併椎管狹窄癥患者隨機分為兩組:A組(n=45)單純經椎徬間隙穿刺成功後註入消炎鎮痛藥20 ml;B組(n=45)經椎徬間隙穿刺成功後註入消炎鎮痛藥20 ml+40μg/ml臭氧10 ml;每週一次,3~4次為一療程。對病人治療後1箇月、6箇月的療效進行隨訪觀察,項目包括:①臨床疼痛評價:採用疼痛視覺模擬評分法( VAS)進行評估;②治療有效率:採用改良的MacNab法評價療效。結果①VAS疼痛評分:兩組組內比較,A組治療後6箇月的疼痛評分高于1箇月的評分數值,差異有統計學意義( P <0.05)。組間比較,B組治療後6箇月臨床療效穩定性高于A組,差異有統計學意義( P <0.05)。②治療總有效率:兩組組內比較,A組治療後6箇月的治療總有效率低于1箇月的評分數值,差異有統計學意義( P <0.05)。組間比較顯示,B組治療後6箇月治療總有效率高于A組,差異有統計學意義( P <0.05)。結論椎徬神經阻滯複閤臭氧治療腰椎間盤突齣的遠期臨床穩定性效果明顯。
목적:관찰추방신경조체복합취양치료요추간반돌출적원기림상료효。방법90례경림상진단증실위요추간반돌출합병추관협착증환자수궤분위량조:A조(n=45)단순경추방간극천자성공후주입소염진통약20 ml;B조(n=45)경추방간극천자성공후주입소염진통약20 ml+40μg/ml취양10 ml;매주일차,3~4차위일료정。대병인치료후1개월、6개월적료효진행수방관찰,항목포괄:①림상동통평개:채용동통시각모의평분법( VAS)진행평고;②치료유효솔:채용개량적MacNab법평개료효。결과①VAS동통평분:량조조내비교,A조치료후6개월적동통평분고우1개월적평분수치,차이유통계학의의( P <0.05)。조간비교,B조치료후6개월림상료효은정성고우A조,차이유통계학의의( P <0.05)。②치료총유효솔:량조조내비교,A조치료후6개월적치료총유효솔저우1개월적평분수치,차이유통계학의의( P <0.05)。조간비교현시,B조치료후6개월치료총유효솔고우A조,차이유통계학의의( P <0.05)。결론추방신경조체복합취양치료요추간반돌출적원기림상은정성효과명현。
Objective To observe the long-term clinical effect of paravertebral block combined with ozone in patients with lumber disc herniation. Methods Ninety patients with lumber disc herniation accompanied by lumber spinal canal stenosis confirmed by clinical diagnosis were randomly divided into group A(n=45)in which a volume of 20ml analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs was injected to perform paraverte-bral block and group B(n=45)in which a volume of 20 ml analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs combined with a volume of 10 ml(40 μg/ml)ozone was injected to perform paravertebral block. There was one paravertebral block in a week and three or four paravertebral blocks in a treatment course. The clinical effect including visual analogue scale( VAS)and treatment efficiency at 1 month and 6 months after the treatment were observed. Results The VAS at 6 month after the treatment was significantly higher than that at 1 month after the treatment in group A( P<0. 05)and there was no such a significant difference in group B. The total treatment efficiency at 6 months after the treatment in group B was significantly higher than that in group A( P <0. 05). Conclusion The long-term clinical effect of paravertebral block combined with ozone in patients with lumber disc herniation is definite and stable.