CAJ | 학술논문

前人在论证甲骨文中“朕”可以做主语时，多家多次引用“朕刍于某”作为例证。本文在梳理“朕”、“刍”、“于”三字语用语法情况的基础上，通过对比其他结构相当的卜辞，认为在“朕刍于某”这种格式中，把“朕刍”看成偏正式名词性结构作主语，“朕”表领格，“刍”为名词，“于”作谓语，“某”作地点宾语，更符合甲骨文的语言事实。
전인재론증갑골문중“짐”가이주주어시，다가다차인용“짐추우모”작위예증。본문재소리“짐”、“추”、“우”삼자어용어법정황적기출상，통과대비기타결구상당적복사，인위재“짐추우모”저충격식중，파“짐추”간성편정식명사성결구작주어，“짐”표령격，“추”위명사，“우”작위어，“모”작지점빈어，경부합갑골문적어언사실。
Many former scholars quoted the structure of Zhen Chu Yu Mou as the case to demonstrate the sub-ject Zhen(the emperor)in the inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells. This paper,on the basis of carding the pragmatic the grammatical cases of Zhen,Chu,and Yu,comparing with other oracle inscriptions,considers that in this structure Zhen Chu should be regarded as a subordinate nominal structure,Zhen the possessive,Chu a noun, Yu the predicate,and Mou the object indicating the place,which is more consistent with the actual situation of the inscriptions on bones or tortoise shell.