食品安全质量检测学报
食品安全質量檢測學報
식품안전질량검측학보
FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY DETECTION TECHNOLOGY
2015年
6期
2209-2213
,共5页
费文静%诸晨%许纪锋%丁慧%钱勇%谢天培
費文靜%諸晨%許紀鋒%丁慧%錢勇%謝天培
비문정%제신%허기봉%정혜%전용%사천배
茶%表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯%含量测定%反相高效液相色谱法
茶%錶沒食子兒茶素沒食子痠酯%含量測定%反相高效液相色譜法
다%표몰식자인다소몰식자산지%함량측정%반상고효액상색보법
tea%epigallocatechin gallate%content determination%reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography
目的:建立反相高效液相色谱法检测茶叶中表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯(epigallocatechin gallate, EGCG)的含量,并对比不同茶叶中EGCG的含量。方法对不同产地茶叶样品用70%甲醇提取10 min,提取后冷却至室温,提取溶液经过离心;采用反相色谱柱Agilent SB-C18(4.6 mm×250 mm,5μm)检测,以流动相A(90 mL乙腈:20 mL乙酸:2 mL 乙二胺四乙酸二钠:888 mL水)、流动相B(800 mL乙腈:20 mL乙酸:2 mL 乙二胺四乙酸二钠:178 mL水)梯度洗脱,流速1.0 mL/min,柱温35℃,检测波长278 nm。结果 EGCG在78.0~468.0μg/mL的范围内与峰面积积分值呈良好的线性关系(r2=1.0000),平均加标回收率为95.6%, RSD为1.29%。结论该方法简单、灵敏、稳定、可靠,可用于不同茶叶EGCG的含量测定。实验同时发现,不同茶叶由于产地和工艺不同, EGCG含量差异较为明显。
目的:建立反相高效液相色譜法檢測茶葉中錶沒食子兒茶素沒食子痠酯(epigallocatechin gallate, EGCG)的含量,併對比不同茶葉中EGCG的含量。方法對不同產地茶葉樣品用70%甲醇提取10 min,提取後冷卻至室溫,提取溶液經過離心;採用反相色譜柱Agilent SB-C18(4.6 mm×250 mm,5μm)檢測,以流動相A(90 mL乙腈:20 mL乙痠:2 mL 乙二胺四乙痠二鈉:888 mL水)、流動相B(800 mL乙腈:20 mL乙痠:2 mL 乙二胺四乙痠二鈉:178 mL水)梯度洗脫,流速1.0 mL/min,柱溫35℃,檢測波長278 nm。結果 EGCG在78.0~468.0μg/mL的範圍內與峰麵積積分值呈良好的線性關繫(r2=1.0000),平均加標迴收率為95.6%, RSD為1.29%。結論該方法簡單、靈敏、穩定、可靠,可用于不同茶葉EGCG的含量測定。實驗同時髮現,不同茶葉由于產地和工藝不同, EGCG含量差異較為明顯。
목적:건립반상고효액상색보법검측다협중표몰식자인다소몰식자산지(epigallocatechin gallate, EGCG)적함량,병대비불동다협중EGCG적함량。방법대불동산지다협양품용70%갑순제취10 min,제취후냉각지실온,제취용액경과리심;채용반상색보주Agilent SB-C18(4.6 mm×250 mm,5μm)검측,이류동상A(90 mL을정:20 mL을산:2 mL 을이알사을산이납:888 mL수)、류동상B(800 mL을정:20 mL을산:2 mL 을이알사을산이납:178 mL수)제도세탈,류속1.0 mL/min,주온35℃,검측파장278 nm。결과 EGCG재78.0~468.0μg/mL적범위내여봉면적적분치정량호적선성관계(r2=1.0000),평균가표회수솔위95.6%, RSD위1.29%。결론해방법간단、령민、은정、가고,가용우불동다협EGCG적함량측정。실험동시발현,불동다협유우산지화공예불동, EGCG함량차이교위명현。
Objective To establish a method for determining epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in tea by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and compare the content of EGCG in different tea. Methods Different tea was extracted for 10 min by 70%methanol solution;extraction solution was placed at room temperature, and then centrifuged. The chromatographic column was Agilent SB-C18 (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase A was ACN: HAC: EDTA-2Na: H2O = 90:20:2: 888 and the mobile phase B was ACN:HAC:EDTA-2Na:H2O=800:20:2:178. The flow was 1.0 mL/min, the column temperature was 35 ℃ and the detection wavelength was 278 nm. Results EGCG had good linearity with the peak areas in 78.0~468.0 μg/mL (r2=1.0000). The average recovery was 95.6% and the RSD was 1.29%. Conclusion The method is simple, sensitive, stable and reliable and it can be used to detect the EGCG in tea. This paper also finds that EGCG content is obviously different in different tea due to the different origin and technology.