滨州医学院学报
濱州醫學院學報
빈주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF BINZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
3期
202-204
,共3页
颅内压%体位%颅脑损伤%气压治疗
顱內壓%體位%顱腦損傷%氣壓治療
로내압%체위%로뇌손상%기압치료
intracranial pressure%position%traumatic brain injury%intermittent pneumatic compression
目的:观察气压治疗对重型颅脑损伤患者颅内压的影响。方法选取40例行IC P监护的患者,按入院顺序分为A组20例和B组20例,在术后12 h ,A组取仰卧位头部抬高15°,B组取仰卧位头部抬高30°,两组患者应用空气波治疗仪的P1、P2、P3模式结合两种压力8、10 kPa行双侧下肢治疗,观察患者实施空气波压力治疗后,治疗前、中、后颅内压的变化。结果 A、B两组患者应用两种压力结合三种模式下行压治疗时,充气末颅内压与治疗前相比,差异有统计学意义,放气末颅内压与治疗前相比,差异无统计学意义,治疗前后颅内压比较差异无统计学意义。结论术后12 h行双侧下肢气压治疗时,在气压治疗充气阶段需密切监测患者颅内压变化。
目的:觀察氣壓治療對重型顱腦損傷患者顱內壓的影響。方法選取40例行IC P鑑護的患者,按入院順序分為A組20例和B組20例,在術後12 h ,A組取仰臥位頭部抬高15°,B組取仰臥位頭部抬高30°,兩組患者應用空氣波治療儀的P1、P2、P3模式結閤兩種壓力8、10 kPa行雙側下肢治療,觀察患者實施空氣波壓力治療後,治療前、中、後顱內壓的變化。結果 A、B兩組患者應用兩種壓力結閤三種模式下行壓治療時,充氣末顱內壓與治療前相比,差異有統計學意義,放氣末顱內壓與治療前相比,差異無統計學意義,治療前後顱內壓比較差異無統計學意義。結論術後12 h行雙側下肢氣壓治療時,在氣壓治療充氣階段需密切鑑測患者顱內壓變化。
목적:관찰기압치료대중형로뇌손상환자로내압적영향。방법선취40례행IC P감호적환자,안입원순서분위A조20례화B조20례,재술후12 h ,A조취앙와위두부태고15°,B조취앙와위두부태고30°,량조환자응용공기파치료의적P1、P2、P3모식결합량충압력8、10 kPa행쌍측하지치료,관찰환자실시공기파압력치료후,치료전、중、후로내압적변화。결과 A、B량조환자응용량충압력결합삼충모식하행압치료시,충기말로내압여치료전상비,차이유통계학의의,방기말로내압여치료전상비,차이무통계학의의,치료전후로내압비교차이무통계학의의。결론술후12 h행쌍측하지기압치료시,재기압치료충기계단수밀절감측환자로내압변화。
Objective To observe the effect of intermittent pneumatic compression on intracranial pressure in patients with Severe traumatic brain injury .Methods 40 patients with ICP monitoring were divided into group A (n=20) and control group B (n=20) ,according to admission order .In 12 hours after neurosurgical surgery ,group A was positioned with supine head of bed 15° ,and group B was positioned with supine head of bed 30° ,both groups were underwent intermittent pneumatic compres‐sion treatment on bilateral lower extremity with the three models P1 ,P2 ,P3 and the two pressures 8 ,10 kPa .The intracranial pressure changes before ,during ,after the treatment were recorded and analyzed after intermittent pneumatic compression treat‐ment for patients .Results When group A ,B were underwent intermittent pneumatic compression treatment with the three models and the two pressures ,there was significant difference between intracranial pressure in the compression phase and be‐fore the treatment .There was no significant difference between intracranial pressure in the deflation phase and before the treat‐ment .There was no significant difference between intracranial pressure before and after treatment .Conclusion When both low‐er limbs receive intermittent pneumatic compression in 12 hours after craniotomy ,closely observation of intracranial pressure in the compression phase of intermittent pneumatic compression treatment should be needed .