CAJ | 학술논문

本文在梳理国内外集体行动相关理论的基础上，提出了研究集体行动的三个视角：情感、理性与阶层。基于情感视角，本文选取了不公待遇与总体不满意程度等与情感能量密切相关的变量，理性视角主要讨论国家与网络的作用，阶层视角本文主要关注中产阶级与集体行动的关系。并运用CGSS2006数据对相关假设进行检验，展开理论对话。研究发现：（1）与情感视角有关的变量，如，不公平待遇和总体不满意程度，都对个体集体行动参与以及参与程度有着显著影响。（2）长期以来作为国家控制社会工具的单位制，受国企改革、事业单位改革的影响，其影响逐步弱化，无论是体制内单位，还是组织级别，都不能显著降低个体参与集体行动的概率；即便如此，政府力量依然显著影响个体对集体行动的参与，如果集体行动指向是针对国家（政府某项具体政策、某国家工作人员、政府），个体参与集体行动的概率会显著降低。另外，个体网络也对其是否参与集体行动、参与程度有显著影响。（3）作为中产阶级代表的业主阶层以及认同自己属于中产阶级的个体参与集体行动的概率更高，参与程度更深。
본문재소리국내외집체행동상관이론적기출상，제출료연구집체행동적삼개시각：정감、이성여계층。기우정감시각，본문선취료불공대우여총체불만의정도등여정감능량밀절상관적변량，이성시각주요토론국가여망락적작용，계층시각본문주요관주중산계급여집체행동적관계。병운용CGSS2006수거대상관가설진행검험，전개이론대화。연구발현：（1）여정감시각유관적변량，여，불공평대우화총체불만의정도，도대개체집체행동삼여이급삼여정도유착현저영향。（2）장기이래작위국가공제사회공구적단위제，수국기개혁、사업단위개혁적영향，기영향축보약화，무론시체제내단위，환시조직급별，도불능현저강저개체삼여집체행동적개솔；즉편여차，정부역량의연현저영향개체대집체행동적삼여，여과집체행동지향시침대국가（정부모항구체정책、모국가공작인원、정부），개체삼여집체행동적개솔회현저강저。령외，개체망락야대기시부삼여집체행동、삼여정도유현저영향。（3）작위중산계급대표적업주계층이급인동자기속우중산계급적개체삼여집체행동적개솔경고，삼여정도경심。
This article provides a critical examination and evaluation of the theories of collective ac?tion in the United States, Europe and China. Then, it proposes three broad perspectives as a starting point to understand collective action or group events: perspectives of class identity, emotional or rational choice. This paper selects the unfair treatment and overall dissatisfaction with emotional energy to stand for the emotional force, and focuses on the role of the government and of the social network to test the hypothesis of rational choice theory. We also focus on participation of middle class in collective action.Therefore, this paper employs a comprehensive program based on the data of CGSS2006 to verify how the emotional, ratio?nal, and class status influence individual participation in collective action. The study found: ( 1)Those vari?ables related to the emotional perspective, including the unfair treatment experience, individual ’s dissatis?faction, have significant impact on his/her participation and involvement of collective action. ( 2)Danwei, used to be State-controlled social tool, its control is eroding because of the reform of state-owned enter?prises and institutions. However, government forces still significantly affect the individual's participation. If actions are against the government (specific policy, government officer, the government), the probability of an individual to participate in will be significantly lower. ( 3)Those who identify themselves as the mid?dle class will participate in the collective action with a higher possibility and greater depth.