CAJ | 학술논문

通过对国内典型工科院校全日制工程硕士选拔方式的调研，以及对抽样的部分全日制硕士研究生参加GCT考试结果的分析，比较了现行全日制工程硕士与非全日制工程硕士和全日制工学硕士选拔方式的特点，提出进一步完善全日制工程硕士选拔方式的建议：全日制工程硕士应当采取与全日制工学硕士相类似的选拔方式，并适当引入类似GCT的语言表达能力测试和逻辑推理能力测试的考试内容，加强对考生综合能力的考核。
통과대국내전형공과원교전일제공정석사선발방식적조연，이급대추양적부분전일제석사연구생삼가GCT고시결과적분석，비교료현행전일제공정석사여비전일제공정석사화전일제공학석사선발방식적특점，제출진일보완선전일제공정석사선발방식적건의：전일제공정석사응당채취여전일제공학석사상유사적선발방식，병괄당인입유사GCT적어언표체능력측시화라집추리능력측시적고시내용，가강대고생종합능력적고핵。
This article compares the characteristics of selection methods in current full-time Master of Engineering and part-time Master of Engineering and full-time Master of Science in Engineering by the survey of the selection methods of full-time Master of Engi-neering by typical domestic engineering colleges,as well as the analysis of the sampling part of full-time postgraduates who participated in the GCT exam. According to the analysis results,we suggested that the selection method of full-time Master of Engineering should be similar to that of full-time Master of Science in Engineering,and it should strengthen the assessment of comprehensive ability of candi-dates through introducing language skill test and logical reasoning ability test that are similar to GCT.