中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
14期
56-57
,共2页
微创软通道引流术%高血压脑出血%临床效果
微創軟通道引流術%高血壓腦齣血%臨床效果
미창연통도인류술%고혈압뇌출혈%림상효과
Minimaly invasive soft tube drainage%Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage%Clinical effect
目的：探究高血压脑出血行微创软通道引流术的临床疗效。方法择取我院收治的高血压脑出血患者68例，随机分成两组，对照组实施内科保守治疗，实验组实施微创软通道引流术，对比两组临床治疗效果。结果实验组神经功能缺损评分（9.76±4.52 vs 15.54±9.43）、日常活动能力评分（79.23±10.23 vs 47.32±5.87）均优于对照组，且并发症发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论微创软通道引流术治疗高血压脑出血临床疗效确切，安全指数高，临床上应引起足够重视。
目的：探究高血壓腦齣血行微創軟通道引流術的臨床療效。方法擇取我院收治的高血壓腦齣血患者68例，隨機分成兩組，對照組實施內科保守治療，實驗組實施微創軟通道引流術，對比兩組臨床治療效果。結果實驗組神經功能缺損評分（9.76±4.52 vs 15.54±9.43）、日常活動能力評分（79.23±10.23 vs 47.32±5.87）均優于對照組，且併髮癥髮生率低于對照組，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論微創軟通道引流術治療高血壓腦齣血臨床療效確切，安全指數高，臨床上應引起足夠重視。
목적：탐구고혈압뇌출혈행미창연통도인류술적림상료효。방법택취아원수치적고혈압뇌출혈환자68례，수궤분성량조，대조조실시내과보수치료，실험조실시미창연통도인류술，대비량조림상치료효과。결과실험조신경공능결손평분（9.76±4.52 vs 15.54±9.43）、일상활동능력평분（79.23±10.23 vs 47.32±5.87）균우우대조조，차병발증발생솔저우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론미창연통도인류술치료고혈압뇌출혈림상료효학절，안전지수고，림상상응인기족구중시。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of minimaly invasive soft-channel drainage of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.MethodsChose to take our hospital,68 cases of patients with cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into two groups,the implementation of conservative treatment,the experimental group,minimaly invasive soft drainage channel,compared two groups of clinical effect.ResultsThe neurological deficit score(9.76±4.52 vs 15.54±9.43),activities of daily living score(79.23±10.23 vs 47.32±5.87)than the control group,and the incidence of complications was significantly lower than the control group,the difference was statisticaly significant(P< 0.05).ConclusionMinimaly invasive soft-channel drainage treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage has a good clinical efficacy.
