中国医院统计
中國醫院統計
중국의원통계
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL STATISTICS
2015年
3期
179-182
,共4页
主成分分析法%医疗质量%综合评价
主成分分析法%醫療質量%綜閤評價
주성분분석법%의료질량%종합평개
Principal component analysis%Medical quality%Comprehensive evaluation
目的:为了了解揭阳市二级综合医院的医疗质量状况,对9所医院综合水平进行排序,为医院管理者找出薄弱环节,提高综合管理水平提供依据。方法选取具有代表性的指标共15项,组成医疗质量综合评价指标体系,将原始数据进行标准化处理,用Excel和SPSS 17.0软件进行主成分分析,计算出9所医院的医疗质量综合评价值并进行排序。结果从15项指标中可以提取3个公因子,3个公因子的累计方差贡献率为86.943%。按主成分分析的综合评价值对揭阳市9所二级综合医院进行排序,I医院为最佳,H医院次之,B医院最差。综合排序与原始数据变化方向基本一致。结论主成分分析法能够客观、全面地反映医院各项医疗指标的变化,该评价方法能够准确反映医院医疗工作质量的变化趋势,在综合评价中具有较强的应用价值。
目的:為瞭瞭解揭暘市二級綜閤醫院的醫療質量狀況,對9所醫院綜閤水平進行排序,為醫院管理者找齣薄弱環節,提高綜閤管理水平提供依據。方法選取具有代錶性的指標共15項,組成醫療質量綜閤評價指標體繫,將原始數據進行標準化處理,用Excel和SPSS 17.0軟件進行主成分分析,計算齣9所醫院的醫療質量綜閤評價值併進行排序。結果從15項指標中可以提取3箇公因子,3箇公因子的纍計方差貢獻率為86.943%。按主成分分析的綜閤評價值對揭暘市9所二級綜閤醫院進行排序,I醫院為最佳,H醫院次之,B醫院最差。綜閤排序與原始數據變化方嚮基本一緻。結論主成分分析法能夠客觀、全麵地反映醫院各項醫療指標的變化,該評價方法能夠準確反映醫院醫療工作質量的變化趨勢,在綜閤評價中具有較彊的應用價值。
목적:위료료해게양시이급종합의원적의료질량상황,대9소의원종합수평진행배서,위의원관리자조출박약배절,제고종합관리수평제공의거。방법선취구유대표성적지표공15항,조성의료질량종합평개지표체계,장원시수거진행표준화처리,용Excel화SPSS 17.0연건진행주성분분석,계산출9소의원적의료질량종합평개치병진행배서。결과종15항지표중가이제취3개공인자,3개공인자적루계방차공헌솔위86.943%。안주성분분석적종합평개치대게양시9소이급종합의원진행배서,I의원위최가,H의원차지,B의원최차。종합배서여원시수거변화방향기본일치。결론주성분분석법능구객관、전면지반영의원각항의료지표적변화,해평개방법능구준학반영의원의료공작질량적변화추세,재종합평개중구유교강적응용개치。
Objective In order to understand the medical quality of Jieyang secondary comperhensive hospitals, to sort nine hospitals based on comprehensive levels for hospital managers to identify weak links, and to to provide basis for raising the level of integrated management. Methods We selected representative 15 indexes to build the comprehensive evaluation index system of medical treatment quality, processed the original data with standards, using excel and spss 17. 0 software principal component analysis, and calculated the medical quality comprehensive evaluation value of 9 hospitals and sorted them. Results From 15 indicators, three common factors were extracted and their cumulative variance contribution rate was 86. 943%. Accord-ing to the comprehensive evaluation value of principal component analysis, we ranked in general the hospitals, with I hospital the best, H hospital the second, and B hospital the worst. The ranking was consistent with the change direction of the original data. Conclusion Principal component analysis can objectivelyand comprehensively reflect changes of the medical indexes. The eval-uation method can accurately reflect the change trend of hospital medical work quality, and has great application value in the comprehensive evaluation.