中国医院统计
中國醫院統計
중국의원통계
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL STATISTICS
2015年
3期
170-172
,共3页
重症监护室%医院感染%危险因素%Meta分析
重癥鑑護室%醫院感染%危險因素%Meta分析
중증감호실%의원감염%위험인소%Meta분석
Intensive care unit%Hospital infection%Risk factors%Meta-analysis
目的:综合评价重症监护室( ICU)患者发生医院感染的危险因素,为ICU医院感染的预防控制决策提供参考依据。方法应用Meta分析方法对国内11篇有关ICU医院感染的主要危险因素的病例-对照研究结果进行定量综合分析;采用Review Manager 5.2进行一致性检验及合并OR值和95%置信区间的计算。结果各因素合并OR值分别为:年龄≥60岁OR=1.73(95%CI:1.29~2.31);住院天数≥7天OR=7.43(95%CI:2.02~27.34);气管切开/插管OR=4.37(95%CI:1.74~10.96);留置导尿OR=3.83(95%CI:1.89~7.79);深静脉置管OR=3.58(95%CI:1.99~6.42);抗生素使用≥3种OR=2.51(95%CI:1.45~4.36);昏迷OR=3.87(95%CI:2.06~7.26);免疫制剂OR=2.42(95%CI:1.39~4.23)。结论影响重症监护室医院感染的危险因素为年龄、住院天数、气管切开/插管、留置导尿、深静脉置管、抗生素使用、昏迷及免疫制剂的使用,为ICU医院感染的预防提供了科学依据。
目的:綜閤評價重癥鑑護室( ICU)患者髮生醫院感染的危險因素,為ICU醫院感染的預防控製決策提供參攷依據。方法應用Meta分析方法對國內11篇有關ICU醫院感染的主要危險因素的病例-對照研究結果進行定量綜閤分析;採用Review Manager 5.2進行一緻性檢驗及閤併OR值和95%置信區間的計算。結果各因素閤併OR值分彆為:年齡≥60歲OR=1.73(95%CI:1.29~2.31);住院天數≥7天OR=7.43(95%CI:2.02~27.34);氣管切開/插管OR=4.37(95%CI:1.74~10.96);留置導尿OR=3.83(95%CI:1.89~7.79);深靜脈置管OR=3.58(95%CI:1.99~6.42);抗生素使用≥3種OR=2.51(95%CI:1.45~4.36);昏迷OR=3.87(95%CI:2.06~7.26);免疫製劑OR=2.42(95%CI:1.39~4.23)。結論影響重癥鑑護室醫院感染的危險因素為年齡、住院天數、氣管切開/插管、留置導尿、深靜脈置管、抗生素使用、昏迷及免疫製劑的使用,為ICU醫院感染的預防提供瞭科學依據。
목적:종합평개중증감호실( ICU)환자발생의원감염적위험인소,위ICU의원감염적예방공제결책제공삼고의거。방법응용Meta분석방법대국내11편유관ICU의원감염적주요위험인소적병례-대조연구결과진행정량종합분석;채용Review Manager 5.2진행일치성검험급합병OR치화95%치신구간적계산。결과각인소합병OR치분별위:년령≥60세OR=1.73(95%CI:1.29~2.31);주원천수≥7천OR=7.43(95%CI:2.02~27.34);기관절개/삽관OR=4.37(95%CI:1.74~10.96);류치도뇨OR=3.83(95%CI:1.89~7.79);심정맥치관OR=3.58(95%CI:1.99~6.42);항생소사용≥3충OR=2.51(95%CI:1.45~4.36);혼미OR=3.87(95%CI:2.06~7.26);면역제제OR=2.42(95%CI:1.39~4.23)。결론영향중증감호실의원감염적위험인소위년령、주원천수、기관절개/삽관、류치도뇨、심정맥치관、항생소사용、혼미급면역제제적사용,위ICU의원감염적예방제공료과학의거。
Objective To provide evidence for decision-making on hospital infection prevention through studying the main risk factors related to the incidence of hospital infection. Methods Meta-analysis was used to comprehensively and quanti-tatively evaluate the 11 case-control studies on risk factors of hospital infection. With Review Manager 5. 2 we carried out consis-tency check, pooled OR and calculated 95% confidence interval. Results The pooled odds ratio values were 1. 73(95%CI:1. 29~2. 31)for patients aged 60 and above, 7. 43(95%CI:2. 02~27. 34)for those with 7 hospitalization days and above, 4. 37 (95%CI:1. 74~10. 96)for those with tracheostomy/intubation, 3. 83(95%CI:1. 89~7. 79)for those with catheterization, 3. 58 (95%CI:1. 99~6. 42)for those with deep venous catheter, 2. 51(95%CI:1. 45~4. 36)for those with 3 types of antibiotic use and above, 3. 87(95%CI:2. 06~7. 26)for those in coma, and 2. 42(95%CI:1. 39~4. 23)for those with immune agents. Con-clusion The major risk factors influencing the incidence of hospital infection in China were aging, days in hospital, tracheosto-my/intubation, catheterization, deep venous catheter, types of antibiotic use, coma, and immune agents, and the results could provide scientific basis for hospital infection intervention.