中华实用儿科临床杂志
中華實用兒科臨床雜誌
중화실용인과림상잡지
Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2015年
12期
921-924
,共4页
阮媛媛%刘智胜%李承%江军%王育继
阮媛媛%劉智勝%李承%江軍%王育繼
원원원%류지성%리승%강군%왕육계
间断节律闪光刺激%视频脑电图%光敏性癫(癎)%红色滤片%图形滤片
間斷節律閃光刺激%視頻腦電圖%光敏性癲(癎)%紅色濾片%圖形濾片
간단절률섬광자격%시빈뇌전도%광민성전(간)%홍색려편%도형려편
Intermittent photic stimulation%Video-electroencephalography%Photosensitive epilepsy%Red color plastic plate%Pattern plastic plate
目的 采用间断节律闪光刺激技术,探讨红色滤片及图形滤片在视频脑电图中的临床应用价值.方法 选取2013年3月至2014年3月在武汉市儿童医院行视频脑电图的358例患儿,采用间断节律闪光刺激光源,在红色滤片、点状滤片、常规白光3种条件下,对358例患儿进行闪光刺激检查,对其中光驱动反应(PDR)阳性、光阵发反应(PPR)阳性及光惊厥反应(PCR)阳性患儿在3种刺激条件下的检测结果进行对比分析.结果 29例PDR阳性患儿中,红色滤片、常规白光、点状滤片刺激下枕区同步节律波幅分别为(31.103±8.920) μV、(30.294±7.767) μV、(24.436士8.075)μV,点状滤片刺激引发波幅显著低于红色滤片、常规白光,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.983、2.815,P=0.003、0.008);而红色滤片刺激引发波幅与常规白光刺激比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.368,P=0.710).17例PPR阳性患儿红色滤片刺激引出16例(94.12%),常规白光刺激引出10例(58.82%,且反应强度及持续时间落后于红色滤片刺激),另1例仅由点状滤片刺激引出.3例PCR阳性患儿在红色滤片或点状滤片刺激下更易诱发癫(癎)发作.结论 将红色滤片及图形滤片应用于常规视频脑电图闪光刺激检测可以在减少患者眼部不适感的同时,不影响PDR,提高光敏性癫(癎)及癫(癎)伴光敏性反应的检出率.
目的 採用間斷節律閃光刺激技術,探討紅色濾片及圖形濾片在視頻腦電圖中的臨床應用價值.方法 選取2013年3月至2014年3月在武漢市兒童醫院行視頻腦電圖的358例患兒,採用間斷節律閃光刺激光源,在紅色濾片、點狀濾片、常規白光3種條件下,對358例患兒進行閃光刺激檢查,對其中光驅動反應(PDR)暘性、光陣髮反應(PPR)暘性及光驚厥反應(PCR)暘性患兒在3種刺激條件下的檢測結果進行對比分析.結果 29例PDR暘性患兒中,紅色濾片、常規白光、點狀濾片刺激下枕區同步節律波幅分彆為(31.103±8.920) μV、(30.294±7.767) μV、(24.436士8.075)μV,點狀濾片刺激引髮波幅顯著低于紅色濾片、常規白光,差異均有統計學意義(t=2.983、2.815,P=0.003、0.008);而紅色濾片刺激引髮波幅與常規白光刺激比較,差異無統計學意義(t=0.368,P=0.710).17例PPR暘性患兒紅色濾片刺激引齣16例(94.12%),常規白光刺激引齣10例(58.82%,且反應彊度及持續時間落後于紅色濾片刺激),另1例僅由點狀濾片刺激引齣.3例PCR暘性患兒在紅色濾片或點狀濾片刺激下更易誘髮癲(癎)髮作.結論 將紅色濾片及圖形濾片應用于常規視頻腦電圖閃光刺激檢測可以在減少患者眼部不適感的同時,不影響PDR,提高光敏性癲(癎)及癲(癎)伴光敏性反應的檢齣率.
목적 채용간단절률섬광자격기술,탐토홍색려편급도형려편재시빈뇌전도중적림상응용개치.방법 선취2013년3월지2014년3월재무한시인동의원행시빈뇌전도적358례환인,채용간단절률섬광자격광원,재홍색려편、점상려편、상규백광3충조건하,대358례환인진행섬광자격검사,대기중광구동반응(PDR)양성、광진발반응(PPR)양성급광량궐반응(PCR)양성환인재3충자격조건하적검측결과진행대비분석.결과 29례PDR양성환인중,홍색려편、상규백광、점상려편자격하침구동보절률파폭분별위(31.103±8.920) μV、(30.294±7.767) μV、(24.436사8.075)μV,점상려편자격인발파폭현저저우홍색려편、상규백광,차이균유통계학의의(t=2.983、2.815,P=0.003、0.008);이홍색려편자격인발파폭여상규백광자격비교,차이무통계학의의(t=0.368,P=0.710).17례PPR양성환인홍색려편자격인출16례(94.12%),상규백광자격인출10례(58.82%,차반응강도급지속시간락후우홍색려편자격),령1례부유점상려편자격인출.3례PCR양성환인재홍색려편혹점상려편자격하경역유발전(간)발작.결론 장홍색려편급도형려편응용우상규시빈뇌전도섬광자격검측가이재감소환자안부불괄감적동시,불영향PDR,제고광민성전(간)급전(간)반광민성반응적검출솔.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficiency of intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) with pattern and red color plastic plates in video-electroencephalography(EEG).Methods Three hundred and fifty-eight patients hospitalized in Wuhan Children's Hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were selected,and they were examined by using stroboscope with a red plastic plate,a dots printed plastic plate,and ordinary white flicker for photic driving response (PDR),photoparoxysmal responses (PPR),photoconvulsive response (PCR).The results of patients with PDR,PPR,PCR were analyzed.Results The PDR synchronously evoked by the three flickering patterns were in 29 cases,and the amplitude of photic drivings evoked by ordinary white flicker and red flicker were higher than that of flickering dot pattern [(30.294 ± 7.767) μV,(31.103 ± 8.920) μV vs (24.436 ± 8.075) μV],and there were significant differences(t =2.983,2.815,P =0.003,0.008).However,there was no significant difference between ordinary white flicker and red flicker (t =0.368,P =0.710).The PPR evoked were in 17 cases,and 16 cases (94.12%) of them were evoked by red color,while 10 cases (58.82%) wcre evoked by white light,and 1 case only evoked by flickering dot pattern.However,stronger intensity and longer duration time of PPR were evoked by red color than by white light.In 3 patients with positive PCR,the epileptic seizure was more likely to be evoked by red color or pattern plastic plate.Conclusions IPS with red and pattem plastic plate is more potent in eliciting photosensitive epilepsy in video-EEG than the ordinary white light.Moreover,it could reduce the discomfort of eyes without influencing PDR in comparison to the ordinary white light.