海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
12期
1761-1763
,共3页
边红艳%刘霞%韩继明%郭淑芳%史娟%张永莉
邊紅豔%劉霞%韓繼明%郭淑芳%史娟%張永莉
변홍염%류하%한계명%곽숙방%사연%장영리
生物运动%人际互动%跨文化差异%辨识
生物運動%人際互動%跨文化差異%辨識
생물운동%인제호동%과문화차이%변식
Biological motion%Interpersonal interaction%Cross-cultural difference%Recognition
目的:研究人际交互的辨识特征。方法向参与者播放19项人际互动刺激和8项非交流性对照刺激,要求参与者作答,再由评判员进行判断。结果(1)对交流行为识别率方面女性和男性点光源视频识别率做对比后发现“靠近点”这一动作识别率差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.52,P=0.001);(2)对社会动机识别率方面女性和男性点光源视频识别率做对比后发现,“不要”这一动作识别率存在显著性差异(χ2=8.66,P=0.003)。“哪一个?”这一动作存在显著性差异(χ2=8.37,P=0.004);(3)对具体姿势的识别率差异有统计学意义的是:“我很生气”(χ2=5.44, P=0.020)、“不要”(χ2=8.27,P=0.004)和“捡起来”(χ2=5.70,P=0.017)。结论我国大学生在互动交流识别方面的敏感性较高;在社会动机和姿势识别率方面部分动作和国外研究一致,部分不一致。
目的:研究人際交互的辨識特徵。方法嚮參與者播放19項人際互動刺激和8項非交流性對照刺激,要求參與者作答,再由評判員進行判斷。結果(1)對交流行為識彆率方麵女性和男性點光源視頻識彆率做對比後髮現“靠近點”這一動作識彆率差異有統計學意義(χ2=21.52,P=0.001);(2)對社會動機識彆率方麵女性和男性點光源視頻識彆率做對比後髮現,“不要”這一動作識彆率存在顯著性差異(χ2=8.66,P=0.003)。“哪一箇?”這一動作存在顯著性差異(χ2=8.37,P=0.004);(3)對具體姿勢的識彆率差異有統計學意義的是:“我很生氣”(χ2=5.44, P=0.020)、“不要”(χ2=8.27,P=0.004)和“撿起來”(χ2=5.70,P=0.017)。結論我國大學生在互動交流識彆方麵的敏感性較高;在社會動機和姿勢識彆率方麵部分動作和國外研究一緻,部分不一緻。
목적:연구인제교호적변식특정。방법향삼여자파방19항인제호동자격화8항비교류성대조자격,요구삼여자작답,재유평판원진행판단。결과(1)대교류행위식별솔방면녀성화남성점광원시빈식별솔주대비후발현“고근점”저일동작식별솔차이유통계학의의(χ2=21.52,P=0.001);(2)대사회동궤식별솔방면녀성화남성점광원시빈식별솔주대비후발현,“불요”저일동작식별솔존재현저성차이(χ2=8.66,P=0.003)。“나일개?”저일동작존재현저성차이(χ2=8.37,P=0.004);(3)대구체자세적식별솔차이유통계학의의적시:“아흔생기”(χ2=5.44, P=0.020)、“불요”(χ2=8.27,P=0.004)화“검기래”(χ2=5.70,P=0.017)。결론아국대학생재호동교류식별방면적민감성교고;재사회동궤화자세식별솔방면부분동작화국외연구일치,부분불일치。
Objective To study the interpersonal interaction recognition characteristics of biological motion. Methods We played 19 interpersonal interaction stimulations and 8 non-communication stimulations to the partici-pants, who were asked to answer to the stimulations. Then the results were assessed by the judges. Results (1) As for communication behaviors, point source video test showed that significant difference existed in the recognition rate of“the near point"between females and males (χ2=21.52, P=0.001). (2) As for the social motivation, there were signifi-cant differences in the recognition rate of“don't”(χ2=8.66, P=0.003) and“which one”(χ2=8.37, P=0.004) between fe-males and males. (3) As for specific gestures, there were significant differences in the identification rates of“I am very angry”(χ2=5.44, P=0.020),“don't”(χ2=8.27, P=0.004) and“pick up”(χ2=5.70, P=0.017). Conclusion Chinese col-lege students have high sensitivity in the interactive recognition. In the recognition rates of social motivation and ges-tures, some actions are consistent with foreign studies, and some are not.