中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2015年
3期
231-234,241
,共5页
牛玉宏%金春林%李娜%杨山石%丁汉升
牛玉宏%金春林%李娜%楊山石%丁漢升
우옥굉%금춘림%리나%양산석%정한승
科研竞争力%指标体系%评价%德尔菲法%层次分析法
科研競爭力%指標體繫%評價%德爾菲法%層次分析法
과연경쟁력%지표체계%평개%덕이비법%층차분석법
scientific research competence%indicators system,assessment%Delphi method%Analytic Hierarchy Process
目的 建立医院科研竞争力评价的指标体系.方法 德尔菲法,层次分析法.结果 本研究邀请34名咨询专家,两轮专家咨询积极系数分别为88.24％和94％,专家对各级指标意见的权威系数均大于0.7,协调程度一致性较高,肯德尔和谐系数随咨询次数的增加而增大.经过德尔菲法两轮专家咨询,确定了2个一级指标,10个二级指标,45个三级指标的评价体系.结论 经过两轮德尔菲法专家咨询,全部采用客观指标,确定的医院科研竞争力指标体系有较好的科学性、客观性和可行性.
目的 建立醫院科研競爭力評價的指標體繫.方法 德爾菲法,層次分析法.結果 本研究邀請34名咨詢專傢,兩輪專傢咨詢積極繫數分彆為88.24％和94％,專傢對各級指標意見的權威繫數均大于0.7,協調程度一緻性較高,肯德爾和諧繫數隨咨詢次數的增加而增大.經過德爾菲法兩輪專傢咨詢,確定瞭2箇一級指標,10箇二級指標,45箇三級指標的評價體繫.結論 經過兩輪德爾菲法專傢咨詢,全部採用客觀指標,確定的醫院科研競爭力指標體繫有較好的科學性、客觀性和可行性.
목적 건립의원과연경쟁력평개적지표체계.방법 덕이비법,층차분석법.결과 본연구요청34명자순전가,량륜전가자순적겁계수분별위88.24％화94％,전가대각급지표의견적권위계수균대우0.7,협조정도일치성교고,긍덕이화해계수수자순차수적증가이증대.경과덕이비법량륜전가자순,학정료2개일급지표,10개이급지표,45개삼급지표적평개체계.결론 경과량륜덕이비법전가자순,전부채용객관지표,학정적의원과연경쟁력지표체계유교호적과학성、객관성화가행성.
Objective Establishing the scientific research competitiveness evaluation index system of Shanghai hospitals.Methods Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process were applied.Results Thirty-four experts were invited to provide evaluation index and weighted scores.The positive coefficient from two rounds of expert's consultation were 88.24％ and 94％.The expert's opinion of authority coefficient of each indicator's was greater than 0.7.The degrees of coordinative consistency was high.Kendall concordance coefficient was increasing with the increasing of consulting times.After two rounds of Delphi expert consultation,2 level-one indictors,10 level-two indictors and 47 level-three indictors were confirmed.Conclusions After two rounds of Delphi expert consultation,using all objective indicators,an Index System for research competitiveness evaluation in the hospitals in Shanghai has been created and could be used with scientific,objectivity and feasibility.
