CAJ | 학술논문

近年来，民间非法集资活动猖獗，犯罪案件有增无减，严重损害民众利益、社会稳定和国家经济安全。本文以吴英案为例，运用van Dijk提出的社会-认知话语研究框架，分析中国民营企业家非法集资案涉法话语，即案件审理阶段涉案各方话语以及与此类案件相关的媒体报道和专家评论话语，通过跨学科多视角的话语分析揭示话语与话语权的互动方式，探讨涉法话语权与案件定罪量刑之间关系，为实现司法公正提供有益启示。
근년래，민간비법집자활동창궐，범죄안건유증무감，엄중손해민음이익、사회은정화국가경제안전。본문이오영안위례，운용van Dijk제출적사회-인지화어연구광가，분석중국민영기업가비법집자안섭법화어，즉안건심리계단섭안각방화어이급여차류안건상관적매체보도화전가평론화어，통과과학과다시각적화어분석게시화어여화어권적호동방식，탐토섭법화어권여안건정죄양형지간관계，위실현사법공정제공유익계시。
Recent years have witnessed the rampant illegal underground fund-raising, which greatly affects people’s in-terests, social stability and national economic security. Taking WU Ying Case as a concrete example and adopting a socio-cog-nitive perspective, the present paper attempts to investigate how the trial-related discourse interacts with discursive power and how the latter affects the judgment of the case.