东北林业大学学报
東北林業大學學報
동북임업대학학보
JOURNAL OF NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY
2015年
5期
134-137
,共4页
HJ-1A卫星%数据变换%SVM%树种识别
HJ-1A衛星%數據變換%SVM%樹種識彆
HJ-1A위성%수거변환%SVM%수충식별
HJ-1A satellite%Data transformation%Support Vector Machine ( SVM)%Tree species recognition
本文利用HJ-1A星HSI2级产品数据对大兴安岭塔河地区的森林优势树种组进行识别研究。通过对影像数据进行一阶微分变换、对数变换、对数变换后的导数变换、二阶微分变换、三阶微分变换以后,分别对原始数据和5种变换后数据进行MNF(最小噪声分离变换)变换。用SVM(支持向量机)分类器分别对6种数据监督分类后,进行精度的验证及评价。结果表明:影像数据经过5种变换后,分类总精度均高于未经变换的原始数据,精度提高幅度为1.5%~4.8%,二阶微分变换分类精度最高(精度为89.5%,Kappa系数为0.802);二阶微分变换下的4个优势树种组各自的制图精度和用户精度均高于其他变换方法,平均精度分别为90.4%和90.7%,总平均精度为90.5%。
本文利用HJ-1A星HSI2級產品數據對大興安嶺塔河地區的森林優勢樹種組進行識彆研究。通過對影像數據進行一階微分變換、對數變換、對數變換後的導數變換、二階微分變換、三階微分變換以後,分彆對原始數據和5種變換後數據進行MNF(最小譟聲分離變換)變換。用SVM(支持嚮量機)分類器分彆對6種數據鑑督分類後,進行精度的驗證及評價。結果錶明:影像數據經過5種變換後,分類總精度均高于未經變換的原始數據,精度提高幅度為1.5%~4.8%,二階微分變換分類精度最高(精度為89.5%,Kappa繫數為0.802);二階微分變換下的4箇優勢樹種組各自的製圖精度和用戶精度均高于其他變換方法,平均精度分彆為90.4%和90.7%,總平均精度為90.5%。
본문이용HJ-1A성HSI2급산품수거대대흥안령탑하지구적삼림우세수충조진행식별연구。통과대영상수거진행일계미분변환、대수변환、대수변환후적도수변환、이계미분변환、삼계미분변환이후,분별대원시수거화5충변환후수거진행MNF(최소조성분리변환)변환。용SVM(지지향량궤)분류기분별대6충수거감독분류후,진행정도적험증급평개。결과표명:영상수거경과5충변환후,분류총정도균고우미경변환적원시수거,정도제고폭도위1.5%~4.8%,이계미분변환분류정도최고(정도위89.5%,Kappa계수위0.802);이계미분변환하적4개우세수충조각자적제도정도화용호정도균고우기타변환방법,평균정도분별위90.4%화90.7%,총평균정도위90.5%。
We classified the dominate forest tree species group by one image data of the HJ-1A satellite Level2 HSI product in the Tahe area.We analyzed the image data by first derivative , log, first derivative of log, the second derivative and the third derivative methods , and deposed the original data and five kinds transformed data by MNF ( Minimum Noise Frac-tion) , then verified and appraised them with the SVM ( Support Vector Machine ) after combining with the ground data computing confusion matrix for validation .The classification accuracy with five kinds of transformation was higher than that without any transformation , and the accuracy increased by from 1.5%to 4.8%.The accuracy of second derivative was 89.5%, which was the best with Kappa of 0.802.The mapping accuracy and user accuracy of four dominate forest tree species groups deposed by the second derivative was better than others , and the average accuracies were 94.7%and 91.2%, re-spectively , with the total average accuracy of 90.5%.