CAJ | 학술논문

目的：主要对西医脑出血与中医中风病病名诊断进行对比分析。方法：选取我院于2012年2月-2013年3月收治的脑出血（中风）患者40例，随机分成两组，每组各20例，西医组采用CT诊断脑出血病，中医组采用中医诊断中风病，观察两组的符合率程度。结果：西医组脑出血诊断符合率为90%，中医组中风病病名诊断符合率为90%，P>0.05，显著差异，没有统计意义，但中医组诊断中风病所需要的时间短。结论：通过对比分析，西医脑出血与中医中风病病名诊断没有明显差异，但中医诊断所花费的程序和时间少，两者结合是诊断病名的最保险方法。
목적：주요대서의뇌출혈여중의중풍병병명진단진행대비분석。방법：선취아원우2012년2월-2013년3월수치적뇌출혈（중풍）환자40례，수궤분성량조，매조각20례，서의조채용CT진단뇌출혈병，중의조채용중의진단중풍병，관찰량조적부합솔정도。결과：서의조뇌출혈진단부합솔위90%，중의조중풍병병명진단부합솔위90%，P>0.05，현저차이，몰유통계의의，단중의조진단중풍병소수요적시간단。결론：통과대비분석，서의뇌출혈여중의중풍병병명진단몰유명현차이，단중의진단소화비적정서화시간소，량자결합시진단병명적최보험방법。
Objective:To analysis and stroke disease diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage compared with western medicine. Methods:40 patients with cerebral hemorrhage from February 2012 to March 2013 in our hospital, were randomly divided into two groups, 20 cases for each group. The western medicine group was treated with CT in diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage. The TCM group with chinese medicine diagnosis of stroke, the degree of coincidence rate of two groups. Results:The western group of cerebral hemorrhage diagnosis coincidence rate was 90%. The TCM group of stroke disease name diagnosis coincidence rate was 90%, P>0.05. Difference was not statistically significant, but the chinese medicine diagnosis of stroke required time shorter. Conclusion:Through the comparative analysis of western medicine and TCM stroke, cerebral hemorrhage disease patients have no obvious difference, but spent in TCM diagnosis procedure and time less. The combination is the most secure way to diagnose disease.