临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS
2015年
3期
292-295
,共4页
谭小云%蒲涛%刘计鲁%赵丽%刘伟%许轩铭
譚小雲%蒲濤%劉計魯%趙麗%劉偉%許軒銘
담소운%포도%류계로%조려%류위%허헌명
腰椎管狭窄症%椎间植骨融合术
腰椎管狹窄癥%椎間植骨融閤術
요추관협착증%추간식골융합술
lumbar canal stenosis%lunbar interbody fusion
目的:探讨改良后路椎间植骨融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床效果。方法将186例腰椎退行性病变伴腰腿痛的患者分成两组,分别使用改良 PLIF 和传统 PLIF 治疗。记录所有患者术前、术后 VAS 评分和 JOA 评分。结果两组术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),而手术时间及术中出血量改良 PLIF组均优于传统 PLIF 组(P <0.05)。患者均获随访,时间6~36个月。JOA 评分:两组术后3个月和末次随访与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05),术后3个月与末次随访比较差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05)。末次随访时两组 JOA 评分、VAS 评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论改良 PLIF 治疗腰椎退行性疾病可以获得与传统 PLIF 相同的临床效果,且具有手术时间短、术中出血少及组织损伤轻等优点。
目的:探討改良後路椎間植骨融閤術(PLIF)治療腰椎退行性疾病的臨床效果。方法將186例腰椎退行性病變伴腰腿痛的患者分成兩組,分彆使用改良 PLIF 和傳統 PLIF 治療。記錄所有患者術前、術後 VAS 評分和 JOA 評分。結果兩組術後住院時間差異無統計學意義(P >0.05),而手術時間及術中齣血量改良 PLIF組均優于傳統 PLIF 組(P <0.05)。患者均穫隨訪,時間6~36箇月。JOA 評分:兩組術後3箇月和末次隨訪與術前比較差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05),術後3箇月與末次隨訪比較差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05)。末次隨訪時兩組 JOA 評分、VAS 評分比較差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論改良 PLIF 治療腰椎退行性疾病可以穫得與傳統 PLIF 相同的臨床效果,且具有手術時間短、術中齣血少及組織損傷輕等優點。
목적:탐토개량후로추간식골융합술(PLIF)치료요추퇴행성질병적림상효과。방법장186례요추퇴행성병변반요퇴통적환자분성량조,분별사용개량 PLIF 화전통 PLIF 치료。기록소유환자술전、술후 VAS 평분화 JOA 평분。결과량조술후주원시간차이무통계학의의(P >0.05),이수술시간급술중출혈량개량 PLIF조균우우전통 PLIF 조(P <0.05)。환자균획수방,시간6~36개월。JOA 평분:량조술후3개월화말차수방여술전비교차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05),술후3개월여말차수방비교차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05)。말차수방시량조 JOA 평분、VAS 평분비교차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론개량 PLIF 치료요추퇴행성질병가이획득여전통 PLIF 상동적림상효과,차구유수술시간단、술중출혈소급조직손상경등우점。
Objective To explore the clinical outcomes of modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease.Methods 186 patients with degenerative lumbar disease were divided into 2 groups and treated with traditional PLIF and modified PLIF respectively.Visual analogue scale (VAS)scores and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA)scores were recorded before and after the treatment.Results The postop-erative hospital stay was not different (P >0.05 ),but there were significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of operation time and blood loss (P <0.05).The duration of follow-up was range from 6 to 36 months for all the patients.In both modified PLIF group and the traditional PLIF group,JOA score was significantly increased and VAS score was significantly decreased at 3 months after surgery and at the final follow-up as compared with the score before surgery (P <0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between 3 months postoperatively and the final follow-up in both groups (P >0.05).Neither was the JOA score (P >0.05).Conclusions Functional outcome of modified PLIF is similar to traditional PLIF technique in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease.But it has shorter operation time,and less blood loss and tissue damage.