中国医疗设备
中國醫療設備
중국의료설비
CHINA MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
2015年
6期
68-69,49
,共3页
周围型肺癌%多层螺旋CT%低剂量%常规剂量
週圍型肺癌%多層螺鏇CT%低劑量%常規劑量
주위형폐암%다층라선CT%저제량%상규제량
peripheral lung cancer%multi-slice computed tomography%low dose%conventional dose
目的:探讨低剂量多层螺旋CT(MSCT)在周围型肺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法选择2010年1月~2013年5月梅河口市中心医院收治的315例肺癌高危患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为低剂量组(168例)和常规剂量组(147例),均进行MSCT扫描,管电压均为120 kV,低剂量组采用管电流25 mA,常规剂量组管采用电流250 mA。以纤支镜病理诊断报告为金标准,计算两组的诊断灵敏度、特异度和准确度并进行比较。结果低剂量组的诊断灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为83.7%、90.7%和88.7%,常规剂量组的诊断灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为87.0%、91.1%和89.8%,两组相比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论低剂量MSCT扫描可以满足临床上对周围型肺癌的影像诊断要求。
目的:探討低劑量多層螺鏇CT(MSCT)在週圍型肺癌診斷中的應用價值。方法選擇2010年1月~2013年5月梅河口市中心醫院收治的315例肺癌高危患者作為研究對象,採用隨機數錶法分為低劑量組(168例)和常規劑量組(147例),均進行MSCT掃描,管電壓均為120 kV,低劑量組採用管電流25 mA,常規劑量組管採用電流250 mA。以纖支鏡病理診斷報告為金標準,計算兩組的診斷靈敏度、特異度和準確度併進行比較。結果低劑量組的診斷靈敏度、特異度和準確度分彆為83.7%、90.7%和88.7%,常規劑量組的診斷靈敏度、特異度和準確度分彆為87.0%、91.1%和89.8%,兩組相比差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論低劑量MSCT掃描可以滿足臨床上對週圍型肺癌的影像診斷要求。
목적:탐토저제량다층라선CT(MSCT)재주위형폐암진단중적응용개치。방법선택2010년1월~2013년5월매하구시중심의원수치적315례폐암고위환자작위연구대상,채용수궤수표법분위저제량조(168례)화상규제량조(147례),균진행MSCT소묘,관전압균위120 kV,저제량조채용관전류25 mA,상규제량조관채용전류250 mA。이섬지경병리진단보고위금표준,계산량조적진단령민도、특이도화준학도병진행비교。결과저제량조적진단령민도、특이도화준학도분별위83.7%、90.7%화88.7%,상규제량조적진단령민도、특이도화준학도분별위87.0%、91.1%화89.8%,량조상비차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론저제량MSCT소묘가이만족림상상대주위형폐암적영상진단요구。
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of application of low-dose MSCT (Multi-Slice Computed Tomography) in diagnosis of peripheral lung cancers.Methods Altogether 315 patients who had high risks of lung cancers and had been treated in Meihekou Central Hospital from January 2011 to May 2014 were selected and divided randomly through the random number table into two groups: Low Dose Group (168 cases) and Conventional Dose Group (147 cases). MSCT was performed in both groups with 120 kV tube voltage. The tube current adopted in Low Dose Group was 25 mA versus Conventional Dose Group's 250 mA. Taken pathologically-confirmed bronchoscophic reports as the gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated and compared between two groups.Results The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Low Dose Group were 83.7%, 90.7% and 88.7% versus Conventional Dose Group's 87.0%, 91.1% and 89.8% with no statistically significant differences (P> 0.05).Conclusion Low-dose MSCT scanning had proven its effectiveness in clinical diagnosis of peripheral lung cancers.