中国循证心血管医学杂志
中國循證心血管醫學雜誌
중국순증심혈관의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASES CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
2015年
3期
307-308,312
,共3页
代政学%张敏%李金明%严鹏飞%冯大跃%方连清%王建国%李俊峡
代政學%張敏%李金明%嚴鵬飛%馮大躍%方連清%王建國%李俊峽
대정학%장민%리금명%엄붕비%풍대약%방련청%왕건국%리준협
急性下壁心肌梗死%罪犯血管
急性下壁心肌梗死%罪犯血管
급성하벽심기경사%죄범혈관
Inferior acute myocardial infarction%Culprit vessels
目的:分析不同罪犯血管引起的急性下壁心肌梗死患者的临床特点。方法纳入发病12 h内入院的急性下壁心肌梗死患者268例,急诊行冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查,根据不同罪犯血管将患者分为2组,右冠状动脉(RCA)组:216例为闭RCA塞;左回旋支冠状动脉(LCX)组:52例为LCX闭塞。对两组临床特征和心电图进行比较分析。结果合并右室心肌梗死,心源性休克,RCA组心力衰竭显著高于LCX组(P<0.05);RCA组左室射血分数(LVEF)显著低于LCX组[(51±8)%vs.(58±10)%, P<0.05];但住院死亡率等两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);心电图STⅢ抬高/STⅡ抬高≥1、STV4R抬高≥1 mm、高度房室传导阻滞(AVB)、室速/室颤(VT/VF)各项指标在RCA组显著高于LCX组(P<0.01)。结论 RCA和LCX梗死引起的急性下壁心肌梗死临床特征和心电图表现有差异,心电图Ⅱ、Ⅲ及V4R导联ST段变化能预测急性下壁心肌梗死患者犯罪血管,对临床治疗和预后有指导作用。
目的:分析不同罪犯血管引起的急性下壁心肌梗死患者的臨床特點。方法納入髮病12 h內入院的急性下壁心肌梗死患者268例,急診行冠狀動脈造影(CAG)檢查,根據不同罪犯血管將患者分為2組,右冠狀動脈(RCA)組:216例為閉RCA塞;左迴鏇支冠狀動脈(LCX)組:52例為LCX閉塞。對兩組臨床特徵和心電圖進行比較分析。結果閤併右室心肌梗死,心源性休剋,RCA組心力衰竭顯著高于LCX組(P<0.05);RCA組左室射血分數(LVEF)顯著低于LCX組[(51±8)%vs.(58±10)%, P<0.05];但住院死亡率等兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);心電圖STⅢ抬高/STⅡ抬高≥1、STV4R抬高≥1 mm、高度房室傳導阻滯(AVB)、室速/室顫(VT/VF)各項指標在RCA組顯著高于LCX組(P<0.01)。結論 RCA和LCX梗死引起的急性下壁心肌梗死臨床特徵和心電圖錶現有差異,心電圖Ⅱ、Ⅲ及V4R導聯ST段變化能預測急性下壁心肌梗死患者犯罪血管,對臨床治療和預後有指導作用。
목적:분석불동죄범혈관인기적급성하벽심기경사환자적림상특점。방법납입발병12 h내입원적급성하벽심기경사환자268례,급진행관상동맥조영(CAG)검사,근거불동죄범혈관장환자분위2조,우관상동맥(RCA)조:216례위폐RCA새;좌회선지관상동맥(LCX)조:52례위LCX폐새。대량조림상특정화심전도진행비교분석。결과합병우실심기경사,심원성휴극,RCA조심력쇠갈현저고우LCX조(P<0.05);RCA조좌실사혈분수(LVEF)현저저우LCX조[(51±8)%vs.(58±10)%, P<0.05];단주원사망솔등량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);심전도STⅢ태고/STⅡ태고≥1、STV4R태고≥1 mm、고도방실전도조체(AVB)、실속/실전(VT/VF)각항지표재RCA조현저고우LCX조(P<0.01)。결론 RCA화LCX경사인기적급성하벽심기경사림상특정화심전도표현유차이,심전도Ⅱ、Ⅲ급V4R도련ST단변화능예측급성하벽심기경사환자범죄혈관,대림상치료화예후유지도작용。
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) induced by different culprit vessels. Methods The patients (n=268) with inferior AMI attacked within 12 h were chosen and given emergency coronary angiography (CAG), and divided, according to different culprit vessels, into RCA group (with RCA occlusion, n=216) and LCX group (with LCX occlusion, n=52). The clinical characteristics and electrocardiogram (ECG) indexes were compared between 2 groups. Results The patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction, cardiac shock and heart failure were significantly more in RCA group than those in LCX group (P<0.05). LVEF was significantly lower in RCA group than that in LCX group (51±8%vs. 58±10%, P<0.05). The difference in in-hospital mortality had no statistical significance between 2 groups (P>0.05). The indexes of STⅢelevation/STⅡelevation≥1, STV4R elevation≥1 mm, AVB and VT/VF were all significantly higher in RCA group than those in LCX group (P<0.01). Conclusion Inferior AMI induced by RCA occlusion or LCX occlusion has different clinical characteristics and ECG expressions. The ST-segment changes of ECGⅡlead,Ⅲlead and V4R lead can predict culprit vessels in patients with inferior AMI, which has guide effect on clinical treatment and prognosis.