农业资源与环境学报
農業資源與環境學報
농업자원여배경학보
Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment
2015年
3期
305-311
,共7页
于寒%梁烜赫%张玉秋%孙杨%吴春胜%谷岩
于寒%樑烜赫%張玉鞦%孫楊%吳春勝%穀巖
우한%량훤혁%장옥추%손양%오춘성%곡암
玉米%秸秆还田%土壤微生物%土壤酶活性
玉米%秸稈還田%土壤微生物%土壤酶活性
옥미%갈간환전%토양미생물%토양매활성
corn%straw returning%soil microorganism%soil enzyme activity
为了探明不同秸秆还田方式对玉米根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响,设置秸秆覆盖和深埋2种秸秆还田方式,研究了不同处理(秸秆覆盖于玉米长期连作土壤CT1、秸秆深埋于玉米长期连作土壤CT2、秸秆覆盖于米麦轮作土壤T1、秸秆深埋于米麦轮作土壤T2)对下茬玉米根际土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的影响。结果表明:(1)相同的秸秆还田方式下,T1和T2玉米根际土壤微生物生物量碳、主要微生物及生理类群和土壤酶活性均高于CT1和CT2处理。(2)在玉米长期连作土壤中,秸秆深埋更能提高下茬玉米根际土壤微生物生物量碳含量,增加土壤细菌、放线菌、主要微生物生理类群(氨化细菌、好气性固氮菌、硝化细菌)和降低土壤真菌数量,提高土壤脲酶和转化酶活性。而在米麦轮作土壤中,秸秆还田方式对玉米根际土壤真菌和主要微生物生理类群(氨化细菌、好气性固氮菌、硝化细菌)、土壤脲酶和过氧化氢酶活性影响不大。在吉林省玉米长期连作种植区,秸秆深埋比秸秆覆盖更能有效改善土壤微生物结构。
為瞭探明不同秸稈還田方式對玉米根際土壤微生物及酶活性的影響,設置秸稈覆蓋和深埋2種秸稈還田方式,研究瞭不同處理(秸稈覆蓋于玉米長期連作土壤CT1、秸稈深埋于玉米長期連作土壤CT2、秸稈覆蓋于米麥輪作土壤T1、秸稈深埋于米麥輪作土壤T2)對下茬玉米根際土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的影響。結果錶明:(1)相同的秸稈還田方式下,T1和T2玉米根際土壤微生物生物量碳、主要微生物及生理類群和土壤酶活性均高于CT1和CT2處理。(2)在玉米長期連作土壤中,秸稈深埋更能提高下茬玉米根際土壤微生物生物量碳含量,增加土壤細菌、放線菌、主要微生物生理類群(氨化細菌、好氣性固氮菌、硝化細菌)和降低土壤真菌數量,提高土壤脲酶和轉化酶活性。而在米麥輪作土壤中,秸稈還田方式對玉米根際土壤真菌和主要微生物生理類群(氨化細菌、好氣性固氮菌、硝化細菌)、土壤脲酶和過氧化氫酶活性影響不大。在吉林省玉米長期連作種植區,秸稈深埋比秸稈覆蓋更能有效改善土壤微生物結構。
위료탐명불동갈간환전방식대옥미근제토양미생물급매활성적영향,설치갈간복개화심매2충갈간환전방식,연구료불동처리(갈간복개우옥미장기련작토양CT1、갈간심매우옥미장기련작토양CT2、갈간복개우미맥륜작토양T1、갈간심매우미맥륜작토양T2)대하치옥미근제토양미생물급토양매활성적영향。결과표명:(1)상동적갈간환전방식하,T1화T2옥미근제토양미생물생물량탄、주요미생물급생리류군화토양매활성균고우CT1화CT2처리。(2)재옥미장기련작토양중,갈간심매경능제고하치옥미근제토양미생물생물량탄함량,증가토양세균、방선균、주요미생물생리류군(안화세균、호기성고담균、초화세균)화강저토양진균수량,제고토양뇨매화전화매활성。이재미맥륜작토양중,갈간환전방식대옥미근제토양진균화주요미생물생리류군(안화세균、호기성고담균、초화세균)、토양뇨매화과양화경매활성영향불대。재길림성옥미장기련작충식구,갈간심매비갈간복개경능유효개선토양미생물결구。
Straws contain a large amount of organic matter and nitrogen, phosphous, potassium and different microelements. Straw-returning becomes one of the most important measures to replace the traditional organic fertilizer and increase the soil organic matter. As the bond be-tween next stubble crops and soil microorganism, returned straws play an important role in underground rhizosphere microorganisms environ-ment. In this study, the effects of different straw returning modes on the soil microorganism and enzyme activity were investigated. The experi-ment included four different treatment:the soil of continuous-cropping with straw mulching(CT1), the soil of continuous-cropping with straw buried(CT2), the soil of alternate-cropping with straw mulching(T1), the soil of alternate-cropping with straw buried(T2). Corn was plant-ed in the above treatments and determined the soil microorganism and enzyme activity at the different growth stage. The results showed that under the same straw-returning, the microbial biomass carbon content, corn microorganism and soil enzyme activities of T1 and T2 were high-er than those of CT1 and CT2. In the soil of continuous-cropping, compared with the straw-mulching, the straw-buried increased significant-ly in the numbers of bacteria, actinomycetes, ammonifying bacteria, aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, nitrifying bacteria and the activities of soil urease and invertase. While in the soil of alternate-cropping, the returning mode of straw had little impacts on the numbers of fungi, am-monifying bacteria, aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and nitrifying bacteria and activities of urease and catalase. It is concluded that the straw-buried can improve the soil microorganisms in the soil of continuous-cropping compared with the straw-mulching.