河南大学学报(医学版)
河南大學學報(醫學版)
하남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF HENAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE)
2015年
2期
94-97
,共4页
李光勇%崔丽丽%曹鹏然%康文艺%李昌勤
李光勇%崔麗麗%曹鵬然%康文藝%李昌勤
리광용%최려려%조붕연%강문예%리창근
高良姜叶%高良姜花%挥发性成分%顶空固相微萃取%气相色谱-质谱
高良薑葉%高良薑花%揮髮性成分%頂空固相微萃取%氣相色譜-質譜
고량강협%고량강화%휘발성성분%정공고상미췌취%기상색보-질보
A lpinia officinarum Hance leaves%Acpinia officinarum Hance flowers%volatile constituents%HS-SPME%GC-MS
目的:分析海南产高良姜叶和花挥发性成分分析并进行比较。方法采用顶空固相微萃取高良姜叶和花的挥发性成分,气相色谱-质谱联用技术检测其成分,峰面积归一化法计算各成分的相对质量分数。结果从高良姜叶中鉴定出32种成分,占色谱总流出峰面积的839.4%,主要是由萜类、酚(醇)类、酯类、酮类和烷烃类组成,其中4‐氨基‐1‐萘酚(139.7%)、3‐氯苯基‐β‐苯丙酸酯(103.3%)、石竹烯(98.5%)、苄丙酮(82.6%)、β‐蒎烯(76.3%)和棕榈酸(34.4%)等化合物含量较高;从高良姜花中鉴定出16种成分,占色谱总流出峰面积的649.9%,主要由酚(醇)类、萜类和酸类组成,其中4‐氨基‐1‐萘酚(20.61%)、石竹烯(10.93%)、棕榈酸(9.15%)、3‐苯基‐2‐丁酮(59.2%)、苯丙醛(27.4%)、β‐水芹烯(27.1%)和芳樟醇(22.8%)等化合物含量较高。结论良姜叶和花中的挥发性成分有很大的差异,本结果可为进一步开发利用该植物资源提供理论依据。
目的:分析海南產高良薑葉和花揮髮性成分分析併進行比較。方法採用頂空固相微萃取高良薑葉和花的揮髮性成分,氣相色譜-質譜聯用技術檢測其成分,峰麵積歸一化法計算各成分的相對質量分數。結果從高良薑葉中鑒定齣32種成分,佔色譜總流齣峰麵積的839.4%,主要是由萜類、酚(醇)類、酯類、酮類和烷烴類組成,其中4‐氨基‐1‐萘酚(139.7%)、3‐氯苯基‐β‐苯丙痠酯(103.3%)、石竹烯(98.5%)、芐丙酮(82.6%)、β‐蒎烯(76.3%)和棕櫚痠(34.4%)等化閤物含量較高;從高良薑花中鑒定齣16種成分,佔色譜總流齣峰麵積的649.9%,主要由酚(醇)類、萜類和痠類組成,其中4‐氨基‐1‐萘酚(20.61%)、石竹烯(10.93%)、棕櫚痠(9.15%)、3‐苯基‐2‐丁酮(59.2%)、苯丙醛(27.4%)、β‐水芹烯(27.1%)和芳樟醇(22.8%)等化閤物含量較高。結論良薑葉和花中的揮髮性成分有很大的差異,本結果可為進一步開髮利用該植物資源提供理論依據。
목적:분석해남산고량강협화화휘발성성분분석병진행비교。방법채용정공고상미췌취고량강협화화적휘발성성분,기상색보-질보련용기술검측기성분,봉면적귀일화법계산각성분적상대질량분수。결과종고량강협중감정출32충성분,점색보총류출봉면적적839.4%,주요시유첩류、분(순)류、지류、동류화완경류조성,기중4‐안기‐1‐내분(139.7%)、3‐록분기‐β‐분병산지(103.3%)、석죽희(98.5%)、변병동(82.6%)、β‐파희(76.3%)화종려산(34.4%)등화합물함량교고;종고량강화중감정출16충성분,점색보총류출봉면적적649.9%,주요유분(순)류、첩류화산류조성,기중4‐안기‐1‐내분(20.61%)、석죽희(10.93%)、종려산(9.15%)、3‐분기‐2‐정동(59.2%)、분병철(27.4%)、β‐수근희(27.1%)화방장순(22.8%)등화합물함량교고。결론량강협화화중적휘발성성분유흔대적차이,본결과가위진일보개발이용해식물자원제공이론의거。
Objective To analyze and compare the volatile components from leaves and of Alpinia officinarum Hance Hainan Provence .Methods The volatile components were extracted from leaves and flowers of A . officinarum by headspace solid phase microextraction and the chemical components of them were identified by GC MS and relative content of the components were calculated with normalization method .Results The results showed that 32 compounds were extracted from leaves of A . officinarum , and the relative content accounted for 83 .94% of the total volatile components . The components was mainly terpenoids , phenols ( alcohols) , esters , ketones and alkanes , and the high content of components were 4 amino‐1 naphthol (13 .97% ) ,3‐chlorophenyl‐β‐phellandrene (10 .33% ) ,caryophyllene1 (9 .85% ) , benzylacetone (8 .26% ) ,β‐pinene (7 .63% ) and palmitic acid ( 3 .44% ) . 16 compounds were identified from the flowers and the relative content accounted for 64 .99% of the total volatile components . The components was mainly composed of phenols ( alcohols) , terpenoids and acids , and the high content of components were 4‐amino‐1‐naphthol (20 .61% ) , caryophyllene1 (10 .93% ) , palmitic acid(9 .15% ) , 3‐phenyl‐2‐butanone (5 .92% ) , benzenepropanal (2 .74% ) ,β‐phellandrene (2 .71% ) and linalool (2 .28% ) . 7 compounds were common in both , but there was great difference of relative content .Conclusion The difference of volatile components in D . versipellis is closely correlated to producing area and growing environment . The results provide reference for further study and development of D versipellis resources .