川北医学院学报
川北醫學院學報
천북의학원학보
JOURNAL OF NORTH SICHUAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
3期
353-355
,共3页
骨折治疗仪%外固定支架%开放性骨折%临床分析
骨摺治療儀%外固定支架%開放性骨摺%臨床分析
골절치료의%외고정지가%개방성골절%림상분석
Therapeutic apparatus%External fixation%Open fracture%Clinical analysis
目的：：分析探讨骨折治疗仪结合外固定支架治疗开放性骨折的临床疗效，为治疗方法的合理选择提供科学依据。方法：将我院2010年2月至2014年6月间收治的骨折患者89例随机分为两组，实验组和对照组。其中对照组45例予以清创、复位、固定以及康复锻炼等骨折常规治疗，实验组44例在常规治疗的基础上加用骨折治疗仪结合外固定支架治疗，比较两组患者间总优良率、住院时间、外固定拆除时间、功能康复时间的差异。结果：实验组总优良率为95.45%，高于对照组82.22%，两组间差异显著，具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；同时实验组患者住院时间、外固定拆除时间、功能康复时间较对照组均明显降低，两组间差异同样具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论：骨折治疗仪结合外固定支架治疗开放性骨折疗效显著，能显著节约治疗时间，帮助患者及早康复，值得临床推广。
目的：：分析探討骨摺治療儀結閤外固定支架治療開放性骨摺的臨床療效，為治療方法的閤理選擇提供科學依據。方法：將我院2010年2月至2014年6月間收治的骨摺患者89例隨機分為兩組，實驗組和對照組。其中對照組45例予以清創、複位、固定以及康複鍛煉等骨摺常規治療，實驗組44例在常規治療的基礎上加用骨摺治療儀結閤外固定支架治療，比較兩組患者間總優良率、住院時間、外固定拆除時間、功能康複時間的差異。結果：實驗組總優良率為95.45%，高于對照組82.22%，兩組間差異顯著，具有統計學意義(P<0.01)；同時實驗組患者住院時間、外固定拆除時間、功能康複時間較對照組均明顯降低，兩組間差異同樣具有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論：骨摺治療儀結閤外固定支架治療開放性骨摺療效顯著，能顯著節約治療時間，幫助患者及早康複，值得臨床推廣。
목적：：분석탐토골절치료의결합외고정지가치료개방성골절적림상료효，위치료방법적합리선택제공과학의거。방법：장아원2010년2월지2014년6월간수치적골절환자89례수궤분위량조，실험조화대조조。기중대조조45례여이청창、복위、고정이급강복단련등골절상규치료，실험조44례재상규치료적기출상가용골절치료의결합외고정지가치료，비교량조환자간총우량솔、주원시간、외고정탁제시간、공능강복시간적차이。결과：실험조총우량솔위95.45%，고우대조조82.22%，량조간차이현저，구유통계학의의(P<0.01)；동시실험조환자주원시간、외고정탁제시간、공능강복시간교대조조균명현강저，량조간차이동양구유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론：골절치료의결합외고정지가치료개방성골절료효현저，능현저절약치료시간，방조환자급조강복，치득림상추엄。
Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of fracture apparatus combined with external fixation for the treatment of open fracture and provide a scientific basis for the reasonable selection of treatment. Methods:89 cases of the fracture patients in our hospital from February 2010 to June 2014 were randomly divided into two groups including the experimental group and the control group. 45 cases of the control group were treated with debridement,reduction,fixation,fracture rehabilitation exercises and other conven-tional treatment,44cases of the experimental group with conventional therapy fracture combined with fracture treatment apparatus and external fixation. Total good rate,hospitalization,and time of external fixation removal and functional rehabilitation were compared be-tween two groups. Results:Total good rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (95. 45% vs. 82. 22%, P<0. 01),while hospitalization,and time of external fixation removal and functional rehabilitation of the experimental group were sig-nificantly lower than them of the control group (P<0. 01). Conclusion:Fracture treatment apparatus combined with external fracture fixation in the treatment of open fractures is significantly effective,which can remarkably save time and help patient recover as soon as possible. The method is worthy of clinical promotion.
