海军医学杂志
海軍醫學雜誌
해군의학잡지
JOURNAL OF NAVY MEDICINE
2015年
3期
238-239,242
,共3页
超声%神经刺激仪%坐骨神经阻滞
超聲%神經刺激儀%坐骨神經阻滯
초성%신경자격의%좌골신경조체
Ultrasonography%Peripheral nerve stimulator%Sciatic nerve block
目的:研究超声引导神经刺激仪在臀下入路坐骨神经阻滞麻醉中的临床应用效果。方法50例足部手术患者,按照数字表法随机分为2组。对照组与观察组每组25例,对照组采用常规神经刺激仪经臀下入路进行坐骨神经阻滞麻醉,观察组在超声引导下辅助神经刺激仪行臀下入路坐骨神经阻滞麻醉,2组穿刺成功后均注入0.4%罗哌卡因25 ml,观察2组患者的穿刺次数(2.5±1.0)次、药物起效时间(14.2±6.1)min以及穿刺成功率。结果观察组的穿刺次数、药物起效时间均明显小于神经刺激仪引导组(P<0.01),但2组麻醉阻滞效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超声引导神经刺激仪在臀下入路坐骨神经阻滞中,穿刺次数、药物起效时间优于单纯使用神经刺激仪麻醉,可在临床中推广应用。
目的:研究超聲引導神經刺激儀在臀下入路坐骨神經阻滯痳醉中的臨床應用效果。方法50例足部手術患者,按照數字錶法隨機分為2組。對照組與觀察組每組25例,對照組採用常規神經刺激儀經臀下入路進行坐骨神經阻滯痳醉,觀察組在超聲引導下輔助神經刺激儀行臀下入路坐骨神經阻滯痳醉,2組穿刺成功後均註入0.4%囉哌卡因25 ml,觀察2組患者的穿刺次數(2.5±1.0)次、藥物起效時間(14.2±6.1)min以及穿刺成功率。結果觀察組的穿刺次數、藥物起效時間均明顯小于神經刺激儀引導組(P<0.01),但2組痳醉阻滯效果差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論超聲引導神經刺激儀在臀下入路坐骨神經阻滯中,穿刺次數、藥物起效時間優于單純使用神經刺激儀痳醉,可在臨床中推廣應用。
목적:연구초성인도신경자격의재둔하입로좌골신경조체마취중적림상응용효과。방법50례족부수술환자,안조수자표법수궤분위2조。대조조여관찰조매조25례,대조조채용상규신경자격의경둔하입로진행좌골신경조체마취,관찰조재초성인도하보조신경자격의행둔하입로좌골신경조체마취,2조천자성공후균주입0.4%라고잡인25 ml,관찰2조환자적천자차수(2.5±1.0)차、약물기효시간(14.2±6.1)min이급천자성공솔。결과관찰조적천자차수、약물기효시간균명현소우신경자격의인도조(P<0.01),단2조마취조체효과차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론초성인도신경자격의재둔하입로좌골신경조체중,천자차수、약물기효시간우우단순사용신경자격의마취,가재림상중추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the effect of subgluteal sciatic nerve blocking by ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve stimulator.Methods Fifty surgical patients who received foot surgery were randomly divided into two groups, the control group and the observation group, each consisting of 25 patients.The patients in the control group had sciatic nerve blocking by using conventional nerve stimulator, while the patients in the observation group received sciatic nerve blocking by subgluteal sciatic nerve blocking by ultra-sound-guided peripheral nerve stimulator.Upon completion of puncture, the patients in the 2 groups were injected with 0.4% ropiva-cain (25ml) .Then, observations were made on the number of puncture, the onset time of medication and success rate of puncture in the 2 groups.Results The number of puncture and the onset time of medication in the observation group were obviously lower than those of the patients with conventional nerve stimulator (P<0.01), however, no statistical significance could be noted in the effect of nerve blocking, when comparisons were made between the 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Subgluteal sciatic nerve blocking by ul-trasound-guided peripheral nerve simulator was superior to subgluteal sciatic nerve blocking in the number of puncture and the onset time of medication, and was worth further clinical extension.