冶金分析
冶金分析
야금분석
METALLURGICAL ANALYSIS
2015年
6期
78-82
,共5页
闻向东%谭谦%邵梅%张穗忠
聞嚮東%譚謙%邵梅%張穗忠
문향동%담겸%소매%장수충
二氧化钛%氯%电位滴定法%超声溶解%硅钢涂层
二氧化鈦%氯%電位滴定法%超聲溶解%硅鋼塗層
이양화태%록%전위적정법%초성용해%규강도층
titanium dioxide%chlorine%potentiometric titration%ultrasonic dissolution%silicon steel coating
采用加酸后超声震荡的方法处理样品,建立了电位滴定法测定了硅钢涂层用纳米二氧化钛中氯离子含量的方法。实验确定了最佳条件:称取0.1 g过300目(50μm)筛孔的样品,加入20 mL硝酸(1+5)后,在90 kHz的条件下室温超声振荡30 min,过滤后稀释,以等体积自动加入0.10 mL 0.01 mol/L硝酸银标准滴定溶液的方式进行滴定,以d2 E/dV2-V滴定曲线中E/V的二阶倒数为零时计算滴定终点。将方法应用于硅钢涂层用纳米二氧化钛实际样品分析,结果与分光光度法一致,相对标准偏差(RSD, n=8)小于5%,加标回收率为99%~102%。
採用加痠後超聲震盪的方法處理樣品,建立瞭電位滴定法測定瞭硅鋼塗層用納米二氧化鈦中氯離子含量的方法。實驗確定瞭最佳條件:稱取0.1 g過300目(50μm)篩孔的樣品,加入20 mL硝痠(1+5)後,在90 kHz的條件下室溫超聲振盪30 min,過濾後稀釋,以等體積自動加入0.10 mL 0.01 mol/L硝痠銀標準滴定溶液的方式進行滴定,以d2 E/dV2-V滴定麯線中E/V的二階倒數為零時計算滴定終點。將方法應用于硅鋼塗層用納米二氧化鈦實際樣品分析,結果與分光光度法一緻,相對標準偏差(RSD, n=8)小于5%,加標迴收率為99%~102%。
채용가산후초성진탕적방법처리양품,건립료전위적정법측정료규강도층용납미이양화태중록리자함량적방법。실험학정료최가조건:칭취0.1 g과300목(50μm)사공적양품,가입20 mL초산(1+5)후,재90 kHz적조건하실온초성진탕30 min,과려후희석,이등체적자동가입0.10 mL 0.01 mol/L초산은표준적정용액적방식진행적정,이d2 E/dV2-V적정곡선중E/V적이계도수위령시계산적정종점。장방법응용우규강도층용납미이양화태실제양품분석,결과여분광광도법일치,상대표준편차(RSD, n=8)소우5%,가표회수솔위99%~102%。
The sample was treated in acid by ultrasonic oscillation. A determination method of chlorine ion content in nanoscale titanium dioxide used in silicon steel coating was established by potentiometric titration. The optimal conditions were obtained by experiments:0. 1 g of sample was screened with 300-mesh (50μm) sieve;the sample was dissolved at room temperature with 20 mL of nitric acid (1+5) by ultrasonic oscillation at 90 kHz for 30 min;after filtration and dilution, the sample solution was titrated with 0. 10 mL of 0. 01 mol/L silver nitrate standard ti-tration solution by isovolumetric automatic addition. The titration endpoint was calculated when the second deriva-tive of E/V in d2 E/dV2-V titration curve was zero. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of actual sam-ple of nanoscale titanium dioxide used in silicon steel coating. The results were consistent with those obtained by spectrophotometry. The relative standard deviation ( RSD, n=8 ) was less than 5%, and the recoveries were be-tween 99% and 102%.