CAJ | 학술논문

目的：研究对不同受试者群体进行针对性的多元化指导，以提高肺功能检测成功率。方法将453例受试者随机分为观察组229例、对照组224例。对照组按常规方法指导，观察组根据不同受试者群体予以多元化指导，比较两组受试者用力肺活量（ FVC）、最大分钟通气量（ MVV）、一口气一氧化碳弥散量（ DLCO－SB）的检测质量，及不同时间段内检测成功率。结果观察组患者在短时内即能达到可接受标准，质量控制达标率及检测成功率高，优于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）。结论肺功能检测时针对不同受试者群体运用多元化指导，能显著提高肺功能检测质量和检测成功率，减少患者体力消耗，缩短检测时间。
목적：연구대불동수시자군체진행침대성적다원화지도，이제고폐공능검측성공솔。방법장453례수시자수궤분위관찰조229례、대조조224례。대조조안상규방법지도，관찰조근거불동수시자군체여이다원화지도，비교량조수시자용력폐활량（ FVC）、최대분종통기량（ MVV）、일구기일양화탄미산량（ DLCO－SB）적검측질량，급불동시간단내검측성공솔。결과관찰조환자재단시내즉능체도가접수표준，질량공제체표솔급검측성공솔고，우우대조조，차이구유통계학의의（ P＜0．05）。결론폐공능검측시침대불동수시자군체운용다원화지도，능현저제고폐공능검측질량화검측성공솔，감소환자체력소모，축단검측시간。
Objective To improve the success rate of detection of pulmonary function by using the diversified guide for different subject group.Methods 453caseswererandomlydividedintotwogroups:229patientsinobservationgroupand224subjectsincontrolgroup. The conventional method is used in control group , and the diversified guide for different subjects is used in observation group .The Forced Vital Capacity ( FVC) , Max Minute Ventilation ( MVV) , Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide of single breath ( DLCO-SB) were com-pared.Results The patients in observation group are come up to the acceptable standards , the quality control standard rate and successful rate of detection are much better than those in control group .The difference between two groups has statistical meaning (P<0.05).Con-clusion The detection of pulmonary function for different groups in diversified guidance can improve the quality and success rate in testing , and reduce physical consumption and shorten testing time .