江汉学术
江漢學術
강한학술
JiangHan Academic
2015年
4期
67-75
,共9页
诗歌体式%言说方式%晚清诗歌%五四新诗%诗歌史%美学机制
詩歌體式%言說方式%晚清詩歌%五四新詩%詩歌史%美學機製
시가체식%언설방식%만청시가%오사신시%시가사%미학궤제
poetry style%way of speaking%the late Qing Dynasty poetry%new poetry in the May Fourth Movement%poetry history%aesthetics mechanism
晚清至“五四”诗歌由旧而新的变迁，既源于语言形式的构造也出自现代经验的催逼，但如何理解文类内部和外部的错综关系，避免把它们或割据式地单独处置或牵强地缝合粘连，实为把握该时段诗歌的关键和难点。“言说方式”因而作如此构拟，即现代性的运作被语言“知觉”时即成了内部与外部的混融，它寄身于形式与经验交织的纹路中，改变诗，也被诗所改变。据此，“言说方式”必须挣脱静止的、惰性的结构，为从根本上克服时间性难题这一哲学和美学的拷问而赢得合法性。它由诗学的诉求而至诗歌史的关切，且在二者的互为征显中，最终作为一个面向诗学与诗歌史双重目标的概念，体现结构与运动、共时性与历史性的辩证法品格。在此基础上，该时段的诗歌在体式与经验之间不间断地角力、相斥与包容，就可以恰当地理解为，诗的异动和凝聚相生、变奏与重建共存的过程。
晚清至“五四”詩歌由舊而新的變遷，既源于語言形式的構造也齣自現代經驗的催逼，但如何理解文類內部和外部的錯綜關繫，避免把它們或割據式地單獨處置或牽彊地縫閤粘連，實為把握該時段詩歌的關鍵和難點。“言說方式”因而作如此構擬，即現代性的運作被語言“知覺”時即成瞭內部與外部的混融，它寄身于形式與經驗交織的紋路中，改變詩，也被詩所改變。據此，“言說方式”必鬚掙脫靜止的、惰性的結構，為從根本上剋服時間性難題這一哲學和美學的拷問而贏得閤法性。它由詩學的訴求而至詩歌史的關切，且在二者的互為徵顯中，最終作為一箇麵嚮詩學與詩歌史雙重目標的概唸，體現結構與運動、共時性與歷史性的辯證法品格。在此基礎上，該時段的詩歌在體式與經驗之間不間斷地角力、相斥與包容，就可以恰噹地理解為，詩的異動和凝聚相生、變奏與重建共存的過程。
만청지“오사”시가유구이신적변천，기원우어언형식적구조야출자현대경험적최핍，단여하리해문류내부화외부적착종관계，피면파타문혹할거식지단독처치혹견강지봉합점련，실위파악해시단시가적관건화난점。“언설방식”인이작여차구의，즉현대성적운작피어언“지각”시즉성료내부여외부적혼융，타기신우형식여경험교직적문로중，개변시，야피시소개변。거차，“언설방식”필수쟁탈정지적、타성적결구，위종근본상극복시간성난제저일철학화미학적고문이영득합법성。타유시학적소구이지시가사적관절，차재이자적호위정현중，최종작위일개면향시학여시가사쌍중목표적개념，체현결구여운동、공시성여역사성적변증법품격。재차기출상，해시단적시가재체식여경험지간불간단지각력、상척여포용，취가이흡당지리해위，시적이동화응취상생、변주여중건공존적과정。
Poetry changes from the old to the new during the period of Late Qing to“May Fourth Movement”, came from both the language style construction and also the press of modern experience. But how to understand the intricate relationship between the interior and exterior of the genre ,and to avoid dispersing them ,or unreasonable combination , this is just the key and difficulty to study the poetry of this period . Thus“speaking way ”may be explained as that modernity would become a mix of internal and external at language“perception”,it lies in the lines interwoven with form and experience ,changing the poem ,while being changed by the poem. So ,the“speaking way”must get rid of static ,inert structure ,in order to overcome the problem of timing and get legitimacy from philosophy and aesthetics. It comes to be concern of poetry history from poetic appeal ,and in the two mutually demonstration ,finally ,as a concept with dual aims of poetics and history of poetry ,it reflects the dialectic character of structure and movement ,synchronic and historic. On this basis,the poetry of this period kept fighting between style and experience,it can properly be understood as a process of movement and reconstruction.
