中国康复
中國康複
중국강복
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
2015年
3期
167-170
,共4页
脑卒中%抑郁%经颅磁刺激
腦卒中%抑鬱%經顱磁刺激
뇌졸중%억욱%경로자자격
stroke%depression%transcranial magnetic stimulation
目的:探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑卒中后抑郁患者的临床疗效。方法:脑卒中后抑郁患者150例,随机分为观察组和对照组各75例。2组均给予脑卒中常规药物治疗并针对性给予康复训练和心理疏导治疗,观察组同时给予左前额叶背外侧区rTMS治疗。治疗前后分别采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD‐17)、Barthel指数、脑卒中影响量表(SIS)进行评定。结果:治疗6周后,2组HAMD‐17评分较治疗前明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组更低于对照组(P<0.05);2组Barthel指数评分和SIS评分均较治疗前明显上升(P<0.05),且观察组更高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗12周后比较,对照组HAMD‐17评分较治疗6周时稍下降,但差异无统计学意义,观察组较治疗6周时及对照组均明显下降(P<0.05);对照组Barthel指数评分和SIS评分较治疗6周时均稍有所上升,但差异无统计学意义,观察组较治疗6周时及对照组均明显提高(P<0.05)。结论:脑卒中并发抑郁的程度与患者的日常生活自理能力以及生活质量呈负相关。rTMS对脑卒中后抑郁患者有明显疗效。
目的:探討重複經顱磁刺激(rTMS)治療腦卒中後抑鬱患者的臨床療效。方法:腦卒中後抑鬱患者150例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組各75例。2組均給予腦卒中常規藥物治療併針對性給予康複訓練和心理疏導治療,觀察組同時給予左前額葉揹外側區rTMS治療。治療前後分彆採用漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD‐17)、Barthel指數、腦卒中影響量錶(SIS)進行評定。結果:治療6週後,2組HAMD‐17評分較治療前明顯降低(P<0.05),且觀察組更低于對照組(P<0.05);2組Barthel指數評分和SIS評分均較治療前明顯上升(P<0.05),且觀察組更高于對照組(P<0.05)。治療12週後比較,對照組HAMD‐17評分較治療6週時稍下降,但差異無統計學意義,觀察組較治療6週時及對照組均明顯下降(P<0.05);對照組Barthel指數評分和SIS評分較治療6週時均稍有所上升,但差異無統計學意義,觀察組較治療6週時及對照組均明顯提高(P<0.05)。結論:腦卒中併髮抑鬱的程度與患者的日常生活自理能力以及生活質量呈負相關。rTMS對腦卒中後抑鬱患者有明顯療效。
목적:탐토중복경로자자격(rTMS)치료뇌졸중후억욱환자적림상료효。방법:뇌졸중후억욱환자150례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조각75례。2조균급여뇌졸중상규약물치료병침대성급여강복훈련화심리소도치료,관찰조동시급여좌전액협배외측구rTMS치료。치료전후분별채용한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD‐17)、Barthel지수、뇌졸중영향량표(SIS)진행평정。결과:치료6주후,2조HAMD‐17평분교치료전명현강저(P<0.05),차관찰조경저우대조조(P<0.05);2조Barthel지수평분화SIS평분균교치료전명현상승(P<0.05),차관찰조경고우대조조(P<0.05)。치료12주후비교,대조조HAMD‐17평분교치료6주시초하강,단차이무통계학의의,관찰조교치료6주시급대조조균명현하강(P<0.05);대조조Barthel지수평분화SIS평분교치료6주시균초유소상승,단차이무통계학의의,관찰조교치료6주시급대조조균명현제고(P<0.05)。결론:뇌졸중병발억욱적정도여환자적일상생활자리능력이급생활질량정부상관。rTMS대뇌졸중후억욱환자유명현료효。
Objective:To investigate the clinical curative effect of the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of post‐stroke depression .Methods:150 cases of post‐stroke depression were randomly and equally divided into two groups :observation group and control group .The two groups were given conventional drugs ,rehabilitation training and psychological counseling therapy .The observation group was subjected to rTMS in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) .The Hamilton depression scale (HAMD‐17) ,Barthel index ,and stroke impact scale (SIS) score were used to evaluate the effect .Results:After the treatment for 6 weeks ,HAMD‐17 scores were significantly lower than those before treatment in two groups(P<0 .05) ,more significantly in the observation group than in the control group (P<0 .05) .Barthel index and SIS scores were significantly increased in two groups (P<0 .05) ,which were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0 .05) .At 12th week ,the HAMD‐17 scores in the control group were decreased slightly as compared with those at 6th week ,but there was no statistically significant difference between two groups .On the contrary ,the HAMD‐17 scores after treatment for 12 weeks were decreased obviously in the observation group as compared those at 6th week and in the control group (P<0 .05) .The Barthel index and SIS scores were increased slightly at 12th week in the control group as compared with those at 6th week ,but there was no statistically significant difference between two groups . On the contrary ,the Barthel index and SIS scores were increased obviously after treatment for 12 weeks in the ob‐servation group as compared with those at 6th week and in the control group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion:The degree in patients with post‐stroke depression was negatively correlated with the self‐care ability of daily life and quality of life .rTMS in post‐stroke depression patients has satisfactory effectiveness .