青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)
青島科技大學學報(社會科學版)
청도과기대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2015年
2期
53-58
,共6页
多维贫困%收入贫困%动态测度%东部省份%相关性
多維貧睏%收入貧睏%動態測度%東部省份%相關性
다유빈곤%수입빈곤%동태측도%동부성빈%상관성
multidimensional poverty%income poverty%dynamic measurement%the eastern provinces%relevance
从四个维度共11项指标测度中国东部地区多维贫困程度,研究发现:1.江苏收入贫困减小幅度比山东显著,两省贫困绝对变化量均表现出农村优于城市;2.做饭燃料和卫生设施指标贫困虽明显下降,但到2011年仍处于高贫困发生率水平;3.受教育和健康状况指标贫困发生率长期处于高位水平,且减贫效果不佳,表现出教育和健康贫困的长期性和持久性;4.1991-2011年,江苏和山东脱贫人口分别增加了37.94%和26.68%,且家户贫困已从高维度贫困降为低维度贫困;5.家户收入水平与多维贫困的相关性并不显著,主要的致贫原因已从收入转化为其他福利维度。
從四箇維度共11項指標測度中國東部地區多維貧睏程度,研究髮現:1.江囌收入貧睏減小幅度比山東顯著,兩省貧睏絕對變化量均錶現齣農村優于城市;2.做飯燃料和衛生設施指標貧睏雖明顯下降,但到2011年仍處于高貧睏髮生率水平;3.受教育和健康狀況指標貧睏髮生率長期處于高位水平,且減貧效果不佳,錶現齣教育和健康貧睏的長期性和持久性;4.1991-2011年,江囌和山東脫貧人口分彆增加瞭37.94%和26.68%,且傢戶貧睏已從高維度貧睏降為低維度貧睏;5.傢戶收入水平與多維貧睏的相關性併不顯著,主要的緻貧原因已從收入轉化為其他福利維度。
종사개유도공11항지표측도중국동부지구다유빈곤정도,연구발현:1.강소수입빈곤감소폭도비산동현저,량성빈곤절대변화량균표현출농촌우우성시;2.주반연료화위생설시지표빈곤수명현하강,단도2011년잉처우고빈곤발생솔수평;3.수교육화건강상황지표빈곤발생솔장기처우고위수평,차감빈효과불가,표현출교육화건강빈곤적장기성화지구성;4.1991-2011년,강소화산동탈빈인구분별증가료37.94%화26.68%,차가호빈곤이종고유도빈곤강위저유도빈곤;5.가호수입수평여다유빈곤적상관성병불현저,주요적치빈원인이종수입전화위기타복리유도。
This paper measures the multidimensional poverty family in eastern China from four dimensions and eleven indexes. Research results show that: firstly, the income poverty of Jiangsu province decreased more remarkable than that of Shandong province, and the absolute variation of poverty in rural is better than that in city both in Jiangsu province and Shandong province; secondly, though the index of cooking fuel and sanitation facilities decreased significantly, they still maintain high rates of poverty in 2011; thirdly, the years of education and health condition have stayed deep poverty and reduced less in a long period of time, which shows that the years of education and health condition are characterized by long-term and persistence in the process of poverty alleviation; fourthly, increased by 37.94% poverty household in Jiangsu province and that of 26.68% in Shandong province have been pulled from abject poverty from 1991 to 2011, and the households’ poverty have reduced from high dimensions to low dimensions; fifthly, there is no significant correlation between the level of income and multidimensional poverty index in household, and the main cause of poverty in household have changed from factor of income into other welfare dimensions.