中国医院用药评价与分析
中國醫院用藥評價與分析
중국의원용약평개여분석
EVALUATION AND ANAL YSIS OF DRUG-USE IN HOSPITALS OF CHINA
2015年
6期
745-746
,共2页
陈学智%唐强%曲华清%王智
陳學智%唐彊%麯華清%王智
진학지%당강%곡화청%왕지
替格瑞洛%抗血小板治疗%不稳定性心绞痛%经皮冠状动脉介入术
替格瑞洛%抗血小闆治療%不穩定性心絞痛%經皮冠狀動脈介入術
체격서락%항혈소판치료%불은정성심교통%경피관상동맥개입술
Ticagrelor%Antiplatelet therapy%Unstable angina pectoris%Percutaneous coronary intervention
目的:探讨替格瑞洛对不稳定性心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后抗血小板治疗的临床价值。方法:选择2013年8月—2014年2月收治的不稳定性心绞痛经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者150例,采用随机数字表法分为2组,对照组(75例)患者口服氯吡格雷,观察组(75例)患者口服替格瑞洛。对比观察2组患者的临床疗效及安全性。结果:用药1周后,观察组患者血小板凝聚率为(40.3±7.5)%,明显低于对照组的(56.2±7.8)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访12个月,观察组患者主要心血管事件发生率为5.3%(4/75),明显低于对照组的16.0%(12/75),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者均未发生严重出血事件及支架内血栓事件。结论:不稳定性心绞痛患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用替格瑞洛,替格瑞洛可发挥较氯吡格雷更强的抗血小板聚集作用,且用药更安全。
目的:探討替格瑞洛對不穩定性心絞痛患者經皮冠狀動脈介入術後抗血小闆治療的臨床價值。方法:選擇2013年8月—2014年2月收治的不穩定性心絞痛經皮冠狀動脈介入治療的患者150例,採用隨機數字錶法分為2組,對照組(75例)患者口服氯吡格雷,觀察組(75例)患者口服替格瑞洛。對比觀察2組患者的臨床療效及安全性。結果:用藥1週後,觀察組患者血小闆凝聚率為(40.3±7.5)%,明顯低于對照組的(56.2±7.8)%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);隨訪12箇月,觀察組患者主要心血管事件髮生率為5.3%(4/75),明顯低于對照組的16.0%(12/75),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);2組患者均未髮生嚴重齣血事件及支架內血栓事件。結論:不穩定性心絞痛患者行經皮冠狀動脈介入治療後使用替格瑞洛,替格瑞洛可髮揮較氯吡格雷更彊的抗血小闆聚集作用,且用藥更安全。
목적:탐토체격서락대불은정성심교통환자경피관상동맥개입술후항혈소판치료적림상개치。방법:선택2013년8월—2014년2월수치적불은정성심교통경피관상동맥개입치료적환자150례,채용수궤수자표법분위2조,대조조(75례)환자구복록필격뢰,관찰조(75례)환자구복체격서락。대비관찰2조환자적림상료효급안전성。결과:용약1주후,관찰조환자혈소판응취솔위(40.3±7.5)%,명현저우대조조적(56.2±7.8)%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);수방12개월,관찰조환자주요심혈관사건발생솔위5.3%(4/75),명현저우대조조적16.0%(12/75),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);2조환자균미발생엄중출혈사건급지가내혈전사건。결론:불은정성심교통환자행경피관상동맥개입치료후사용체격서락,체격서락가발휘교록필격뢰경강적항혈소판취집작용,차용약경안전。
OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical value of ticagrelor as antiplatelet therapy in patients with unstable angina pectoris after undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).METHODS: From Aug.2013 to Feb. 2014 , a total of 150 patients with unstable angina undergoing PCI were randomly assigned to receive either clopidogrel ( control group) or ticagrelor ( observation group) of 75 cases in each group.The clinical efficacy and safety in the 2 groups of patients were recorded.RESULTS:After treatment of 1 week, the platelet aggregation rate in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group [ ( 40.3 ±7.5 )% vs.( 56.2 ±7.8 )%; P<0.05 ]; at 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of MACE ( major adverse cardiovascular events ) in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group [ 5.3% ( 4/75 ) vs.16.0% ( 12/75 ); P <0.05 ]; neither group presented with serious bleeding events and stent thrombosis.CONCLUSIONS:Use of ticagrelor in patients with angina pectoris after PCI may exhibited a better antiplatelet aggregation action and better drug safety.