四川农业大学学报
四川農業大學學報
사천농업대학학보
JOURNAL OF SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
2015年
2期
144-152
,共9页
生态风险%景观结构%土地利用%时空差异%贵州省
生態風險%景觀結構%土地利用%時空差異%貴州省
생태풍험%경관결구%토지이용%시공차이%귀주성
ecological risk%landscape structure%land use%spatio-temporal differences%Guizhou province
【目的】探究贵州省景观生态风险时空变化规律。【方法】基于2000、2005和2010年贵州省土地利用数据,利用 Markov 和 CLUE-S 复合模型模拟出2020年土地利用状况,并以2000、2010和2020年土地利用数据为基础,通过景观结构构建景观生态风险指数,定量评估了研究区景观生态风险。【结果】结果表明:①2000-2020年,研究区景观生态风险水平不断降低。研究区中东部和西部分别以等级较低的生态风险和等级较高的生态风险为主;②低生态风险、较低生态风险和中等生态风险之间转换是该区景观生态风险类型变化的主要特征。生态改善区和生态恶化区分别分布在研究区中部和西部,且都呈增长趋势;③地形起伏梯度上,各景观生态风险类型集中分布于3级以下,整体上呈现出1级>3级>2级>5级>4级的特点,且生态风险变化集中在1级、2级和3级。【结论】研究区景观生态风险趋于改善。自然条件优劣、人口压力以及退耕还林政策是影响研究区景观生态风险时空变化的重要因素。
【目的】探究貴州省景觀生態風險時空變化規律。【方法】基于2000、2005和2010年貴州省土地利用數據,利用 Markov 和 CLUE-S 複閤模型模擬齣2020年土地利用狀況,併以2000、2010和2020年土地利用數據為基礎,通過景觀結構構建景觀生態風險指數,定量評估瞭研究區景觀生態風險。【結果】結果錶明:①2000-2020年,研究區景觀生態風險水平不斷降低。研究區中東部和西部分彆以等級較低的生態風險和等級較高的生態風險為主;②低生態風險、較低生態風險和中等生態風險之間轉換是該區景觀生態風險類型變化的主要特徵。生態改善區和生態噁化區分彆分佈在研究區中部和西部,且都呈增長趨勢;③地形起伏梯度上,各景觀生態風險類型集中分佈于3級以下,整體上呈現齣1級>3級>2級>5級>4級的特點,且生態風險變化集中在1級、2級和3級。【結論】研究區景觀生態風險趨于改善。自然條件優劣、人口壓力以及退耕還林政策是影響研究區景觀生態風險時空變化的重要因素。
【목적】탐구귀주성경관생태풍험시공변화규률。【방법】기우2000、2005화2010년귀주성토지이용수거,이용 Markov 화 CLUE-S 복합모형모의출2020년토지이용상황,병이2000、2010화2020년토지이용수거위기출,통과경관결구구건경관생태풍험지수,정량평고료연구구경관생태풍험。【결과】결과표명:①2000-2020년,연구구경관생태풍험수평불단강저。연구구중동부화서부분별이등급교저적생태풍험화등급교고적생태풍험위주;②저생태풍험、교저생태풍험화중등생태풍험지간전환시해구경관생태풍험류형변화적주요특정。생태개선구화생태악화구분별분포재연구구중부화서부,차도정증장추세;③지형기복제도상,각경관생태풍험류형집중분포우3급이하,정체상정현출1급>3급>2급>5급>4급적특점,차생태풍험변화집중재1급、2급화3급。【결론】연구구경관생태풍험추우개선。자연조건우렬、인구압력이급퇴경환림정책시영향연구구경관생태풍험시공변화적중요인소。
Abstrzct:[Objective]The aim of the study was to explore the temporal and spatial variations of landscape ecological risk in the Guizhou province.[Method]Based on the land use data of Guizhou province in 2000,2005 and 2010,the land use map in 2020 was simulated with the help of Markov and CLUE-S model.Landscape ecological risk index was quantitatively constructed by landscape structure theory.Landscape ecological risk was evaluated based on land use data in 2000,2010 and 2020.[Results]The results showed:① the level of landscape ecological risk de-creased from 2000 to 2020.The lower level and higher level of ecological risk mainly distributed in the east and west of study area,respectively;② the type of ecological risk transformed among low ecological risk,relatively low risk and moderate ecological risk.The improvement and degra-dation type atlas of landscape ecological risk were located in the central and west of the study are-a,respectively and there was a growing trend from 2000 to 2020.③ the ecological risk types mainly occurred in the first three gradient of landform relief with a trend of one gradient > three gradient > second gradient > five gradient > four gradient.The changes in ecological risk types were mainly in one,second and three gradients of landform relief.[Conclusion]The landscape ec-ological risk persistently decreased.The natural conditions,population pressures and the policy of reforestation of the cultivated land were important factors affecting landscape ecological risk.