实用癌症杂志
實用癌癥雜誌
실용암증잡지
THE PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
2015年
6期
849-852
,共4页
张贻超%吴华平%陈胜君%汪飚
張貽超%吳華平%陳勝君%汪飚
장이초%오화평%진성군%왕표
直肠癌%新辅助化疗%腹腔镜手术
直腸癌%新輔助化療%腹腔鏡手術
직장암%신보조화료%복강경수술
Rectal cancer%Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy%Laparoscopy
目的:探讨腹腔镜联合新辅助化疗(CRT)在中低位直肠癌治疗中的效果。方法选取20例行腹腔镜手术+CRT 的中低位直肠癌病例(治疗组),另随机抽取同期收治的行腹腔镜手术的直肠癌病例30例(对照组)。对2组临床资料和手术学资料进行比较分析。结果新辅助化疗组淋巴清扫数目[(10.6±5.2)枚]低于对照组[(15.4±6.9)枚];治疗组保肛率为92.5%(74/80),高于对照组80.8%(97/120),差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。2组在手术时间、术中出血、肛门排气时间、远端切缘阳性、中转开腹、术后并发症发生等方面无统计学差异。治疗组与对照组生存率和无瘤生存率差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜联合 CRT 治疗中低位直肠癌是安全、可行的,具有与单纯腹腔镜手术相同的手术学结果。
目的:探討腹腔鏡聯閤新輔助化療(CRT)在中低位直腸癌治療中的效果。方法選取20例行腹腔鏡手術+CRT 的中低位直腸癌病例(治療組),另隨機抽取同期收治的行腹腔鏡手術的直腸癌病例30例(對照組)。對2組臨床資料和手術學資料進行比較分析。結果新輔助化療組淋巴清掃數目[(10.6±5.2)枚]低于對照組[(15.4±6.9)枚];治療組保肛率為92.5%(74/80),高于對照組80.8%(97/120),差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05)。2組在手術時間、術中齣血、肛門排氣時間、遠耑切緣暘性、中轉開腹、術後併髮癥髮生等方麵無統計學差異。治療組與對照組生存率和無瘤生存率差異無統計學意義。結論腹腔鏡聯閤 CRT 治療中低位直腸癌是安全、可行的,具有與單純腹腔鏡手術相同的手術學結果。
목적:탐토복강경연합신보조화료(CRT)재중저위직장암치료중적효과。방법선취20례행복강경수술+CRT 적중저위직장암병례(치료조),령수궤추취동기수치적행복강경수술적직장암병례30례(대조조)。대2조림상자료화수술학자료진행비교분석。결과신보조화료조림파청소수목[(10.6±5.2)매]저우대조조[(15.4±6.9)매];치료조보항솔위92.5%(74/80),고우대조조80.8%(97/120),차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05)。2조재수술시간、술중출혈、항문배기시간、원단절연양성、중전개복、술후병발증발생등방면무통계학차이。치료조여대조조생존솔화무류생존솔차이무통계학의의。결론복강경연합 CRT 치료중저위직장암시안전、가행적,구유여단순복강경수술상동적수술학결과。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for mid-low rectal cancer.Methods 20 patients with mid-low rectal cancer received laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) after neoadjuvant CRT was the treatment group .Another 30 patients with mid-low rectal cancer received primary laparo -scopic TME was the control group .The clinical data and surgical data of the 2 groups of patients were collected and analyzed com -paratively.Results Lymph node yield in the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (10.6 ±5.2 vs 15.4 ±6.9,P <0.05).Guarantor anus rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group [92.5%(74 /80) vs 80.8% (97 /120)].There was no difference between the 2 groups in the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,intestinal function recovery,positive surgical margins,rate of conversion to open surgery ,and occurrence of postopera -tive complications.There was no difference in the survival rate and disease -free survival rate between the 2 groups.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant CRT for mid -low rectal cancer is safe and feasible ,it produce similar surgical outcome as exclusive laparoscopic surgery.