重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
14期
1936-1938
,共3页
胸椎结核%多椎体%手术方式%比较研究
胸椎結覈%多椎體%手術方式%比較研究
흉추결핵%다추체%수술방식%비교연구
thoracic spinal tuberculosis%multiple vertebral bodies%operation mode%comparative study
目的:比较一期前路病灶清除、植骨融合与后路固定融合联合前路病灶清除植骨融合治疗多发下胸椎结核的临床疗效。方法2002年3月至2010年3月该院经前路病灶清除植骨融合治疗62例多发下胸椎结核患者,其中前路单钉棒系统内固定32例(A组)、后路钉棒系统内固定30例(B组);比较两组治愈率、手术时间、出血量、Cobb′s角及脊髓损伤恢复情况。结果所有患者随访24~36个月,平均28个月,所有植骨骨性融合。术后12个月 Frankel分级评价,A组脊髓损伤好转率76.92%(10/13),与B组(9/11)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.087,P>0.05);A组总体治愈率84.38%(27/32),与B组85.48%(26/30)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.066,P>0.05);术前、术后及末次随访A组Cobb′s角为(28.16±4.16)°、(5.03±3.24)°、(8.81±2.44)°,与B组(26.83±5.41)°、(5.50±3.03)°、(8.06±2.45)°比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.038、t=0.588、t=1.200,均 P>0.05);A组手术时间为(171.31±12.84)min ,与B组(219.23±21.44)min比较差异有统计学意义(t=10.754,P<0.05);A组出血量为(341.25±76.10)m L ,与B组(440.67±67.16)m L比较差异有统计学意义( t=5.439,P<0.05)。结论一期前路病灶清除,前或后路内固定治疗多发下胸椎结核均可获得较好的治疗效果,但病例选择非常重要。
目的:比較一期前路病竈清除、植骨融閤與後路固定融閤聯閤前路病竈清除植骨融閤治療多髮下胸椎結覈的臨床療效。方法2002年3月至2010年3月該院經前路病竈清除植骨融閤治療62例多髮下胸椎結覈患者,其中前路單釘棒繫統內固定32例(A組)、後路釘棒繫統內固定30例(B組);比較兩組治愈率、手術時間、齣血量、Cobb′s角及脊髓損傷恢複情況。結果所有患者隨訪24~36箇月,平均28箇月,所有植骨骨性融閤。術後12箇月 Frankel分級評價,A組脊髓損傷好轉率76.92%(10/13),與B組(9/11)比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.087,P>0.05);A組總體治愈率84.38%(27/32),與B組85.48%(26/30)比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.066,P>0.05);術前、術後及末次隨訪A組Cobb′s角為(28.16±4.16)°、(5.03±3.24)°、(8.81±2.44)°,與B組(26.83±5.41)°、(5.50±3.03)°、(8.06±2.45)°比較差異無統計學意義(t=1.038、t=0.588、t=1.200,均 P>0.05);A組手術時間為(171.31±12.84)min ,與B組(219.23±21.44)min比較差異有統計學意義(t=10.754,P<0.05);A組齣血量為(341.25±76.10)m L ,與B組(440.67±67.16)m L比較差異有統計學意義( t=5.439,P<0.05)。結論一期前路病竈清除,前或後路內固定治療多髮下胸椎結覈均可穫得較好的治療效果,但病例選擇非常重要。
목적:비교일기전로병조청제、식골융합여후로고정융합연합전로병조청제식골융합치료다발하흉추결핵적림상료효。방법2002년3월지2010년3월해원경전로병조청제식골융합치료62례다발하흉추결핵환자,기중전로단정봉계통내고정32례(A조)、후로정봉계통내고정30례(B조);비교량조치유솔、수술시간、출혈량、Cobb′s각급척수손상회복정황。결과소유환자수방24~36개월,평균28개월,소유식골골성융합。술후12개월 Frankel분급평개,A조척수손상호전솔76.92%(10/13),여B조(9/11)비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.087,P>0.05);A조총체치유솔84.38%(27/32),여B조85.48%(26/30)비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.066,P>0.05);술전、술후급말차수방A조Cobb′s각위(28.16±4.16)°、(5.03±3.24)°、(8.81±2.44)°,여B조(26.83±5.41)°、(5.50±3.03)°、(8.06±2.45)°비교차이무통계학의의(t=1.038、t=0.588、t=1.200,균 P>0.05);A조수술시간위(171.31±12.84)min ,여B조(219.23±21.44)min비교차이유통계학의의(t=10.754,P<0.05);A조출혈량위(341.25±76.10)m L ,여B조(440.67±67.16)m L비교차이유통계학의의( t=5.439,P<0.05)。결론일기전로병조청제,전혹후로내고정치료다발하흉추결핵균가획득교호적치료효과,단병례선택비상중요。
Objective To compare the curative effects between one‐stage anterior debridement bone graft fusion and posteri‐or fixation fusion combined with anterior debridement bone graft fusion in the treatment of multiple lower thoracic spinal tuberculo‐sis .Methods A total of 62 patients with multiple lower thoracic spinal tuberculosis in our hospital from March 2002 to March 2010 were treated by the anterior debridement bone graft fusion ,including 32 cases of anterior internal fixation by one screw‐rod system (group A) and 30 cases of posterior internal fixation by two nail‐stick systems(group B) .The cure rate ,operation time ,bleeding volume ,the Cobb′s angle and recovery situation of spinal cord injury were compared between the two groups .Results All patients were followed up for 24-36 months (average 28 months) and showed successful bone graft fusion .In the Frankel classification e‐valuation at postoperative 12 months ,the improvement rate of spinal cord injury was 76 .92% (10/13) in the group A and 81 .82%(9/11) in the group B ,showing no statistically significant difference (χ2 =0 .087 ,P>0 .05) .The total cure rate was 84 .38% (27/32) in the group A and 85 .48% (26/30) in the group B ,showing no statistically significant difference (χ2 =0 .066 ,P>0 .05) .The Cobb′s angles before operation ,immediately after operation and at the last follow‐up were (28 .16 ± 4 .16)° ,(5 .03 ± 3 .24)° and (8 .81 ± 2 .44)° in the group A and (26 .83 ± 5 .41)° ,(5 .50 ± 3 .03)° and(8 .06 ± 2 .45)° in the group B ,showing no statistically sig‐nificant difference (t=1 .038 ,t=0 .588 ,t=1 .200 ,all P>0 .05) .The operation time was (171 .31 ± 12 .84)min in the group A and (219 .23 ± 21 .44)min in the group B ,showing statistically significant difference (t=10 .754 ,P<0 .05) .The bleeding volume was (341 .25 ± 76 .10)mL in the group A and (440 .67 ± 67 .16)mL in the group B ,showing statistically significant difference (t=5 .439 ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion One‐stage anterior debridement ,and anterior or posterior internal fixation for treating multiple lower thoracic spinal tuberculosis can obtain the better curative effect ,but selecting case is very important .