重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
14期
1894-1896
,共3页
唾液%血浆%微小RN A-21%食管肿瘤%诊断价值
唾液%血漿%微小RN A-21%食管腫瘤%診斷價值
타액%혈장%미소RN A-21%식관종류%진단개치
saliva%plasma%microRNA-21%esophageal neoplasms%diagnostic value
目的:研究唾液及血浆中的微小RNA‐21(miRNA‐21)水平应用于早期食管癌的诊断价值。方法选取2011年2月至2014年2月河南省南阳市中心医院收治的112例早期食管癌患者作为观察组,同期来该院进行健康查体的100例患者作为对照组,比较两组查体者miRNA‐21的表达水平,比较唾液和血浆miRNA‐21的诊断价值;研究miRNA‐21水平与肿瘤分期、病理类型和分化的相关性。结果观察组唾液miRNA‐21水平为(6.08±2.22),对照组为(0.64±0.09),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的血浆miRNA‐21表达水平为(20.91±10.59),对照组为(1.69±0.17),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。唾液中的miRNA‐21水平ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.8665,灵敏度为88.24%,特异度为69.97%;血浆中的miRNA‐21 AUC为0.8820,灵敏度为90.20%,特异度为70.69%,二者诊断价值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。唾液与血浆中的miRNA‐21水平与早期食管癌的分期和病理类型无明显的相关性(P>0.05),与分化程度相关性较强(P<0.05)。结论唾液及血浆中的miRNA‐21水平应用于早期食管癌具有较高的诊断价值,唾液可能代替血浆应用于早期食管癌的诊断。
目的:研究唾液及血漿中的微小RNA‐21(miRNA‐21)水平應用于早期食管癌的診斷價值。方法選取2011年2月至2014年2月河南省南暘市中心醫院收治的112例早期食管癌患者作為觀察組,同期來該院進行健康查體的100例患者作為對照組,比較兩組查體者miRNA‐21的錶達水平,比較唾液和血漿miRNA‐21的診斷價值;研究miRNA‐21水平與腫瘤分期、病理類型和分化的相關性。結果觀察組唾液miRNA‐21水平為(6.08±2.22),對照組為(0.64±0.09),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組的血漿miRNA‐21錶達水平為(20.91±10.59),對照組為(1.69±0.17),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。唾液中的miRNA‐21水平ROC麯線下麵積(AUC)為0.8665,靈敏度為88.24%,特異度為69.97%;血漿中的miRNA‐21 AUC為0.8820,靈敏度為90.20%,特異度為70.69%,二者診斷價值差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。唾液與血漿中的miRNA‐21水平與早期食管癌的分期和病理類型無明顯的相關性(P>0.05),與分化程度相關性較彊(P<0.05)。結論唾液及血漿中的miRNA‐21水平應用于早期食管癌具有較高的診斷價值,唾液可能代替血漿應用于早期食管癌的診斷。
목적:연구타액급혈장중적미소RNA‐21(miRNA‐21)수평응용우조기식관암적진단개치。방법선취2011년2월지2014년2월하남성남양시중심의원수치적112례조기식관암환자작위관찰조,동기래해원진행건강사체적100례환자작위대조조,비교량조사체자miRNA‐21적표체수평,비교타액화혈장miRNA‐21적진단개치;연구miRNA‐21수평여종류분기、병리류형화분화적상관성。결과관찰조타액miRNA‐21수평위(6.08±2.22),대조조위(0.64±0.09),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조적혈장miRNA‐21표체수평위(20.91±10.59),대조조위(1.69±0.17),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。타액중적miRNA‐21수평ROC곡선하면적(AUC)위0.8665,령민도위88.24%,특이도위69.97%;혈장중적miRNA‐21 AUC위0.8820,령민도위90.20%,특이도위70.69%,이자진단개치차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。타액여혈장중적miRNA‐21수평여조기식관암적분기화병리류형무명현적상관성(P>0.05),여분화정도상관성교강(P<0.05)。결론타액급혈장중적miRNA‐21수평응용우조기식관암구유교고적진단개치,타액가능대체혈장응용우조기식관암적진단。
Objective To study the diagnostic values of salivary and plasma microRNA‐21 for e early esophageal cancer . Methods Totally 112 patients with early esophageal cancer in Nanyang Municipal Central Hospital from February 2011 to Febru‐ary 2014 were selected as the observation group and contemporaneous 100 healthy people of physical examination were selected as the contract group .The salivary and plasma microRNA‐21 expression levels were compared between the two groups ;the diagnostic values of salivary versus plasma microRNA‐21 for the early esophageal cancer were also compared;the correlation between the miR‐NA‐21 level with the stage ,pathogenic type and differentiation of early esophageal cancer .Results The salivary microRNA‐21 level (6 .08 ± 2 .22) in the observation group and (0 .64 ± 0 .09) in the control group ,the difference had statistical significance (P<0 .05);the plasma microRNA‐21 level in the observation group was (20 .91 ± 10 .59) and (1 .69 ± 0 .17) in the constract group ,the difference had statistical significance (P<0 .05) .The area underROC curve(AUC) of salivary microRNA‐21 level was 0 .866 5 ,the sensitivity was 88 .24% ,the specificity was 69 .97% ;while AUC of plasma microRNA‐21 level was 0 .882 0 ,the sensitivity was 90 .20% ,the specificity was 70 .69% ,the differences in the diagnostic value had no statistical significance between them(P>0 .05) . The salivary and plasma microRNA‐21 levels had no obvious correlation with the stage and pathogenic type of early esophageal cancer(P>0 .05) ,while had strong correlation with the differentiation degree(P<0 .05) .Conclusion Salivary and plasma microR‐NA‐21 has higher diagnostic value in for early esophageal cancer ,and saliva may supplant plasma in the diagnosis of early esophage‐al cancer .