食品与生物技术学报
食品與生物技術學報
식품여생물기술학보
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
2015年
6期
575-583
,共9页
李艳肖%黄晓玮%邹小波%赵杰文%石吉勇%张小磊
李豔肖%黃曉瑋%鄒小波%趙傑文%石吉勇%張小磊
리염초%황효위%추소파%조걸문%석길용%장소뢰
蚁群算法%遗传算法%区间偏最小二乘法%花茶%花青素%定量分析模型
蟻群算法%遺傳算法%區間偏最小二乘法%花茶%花青素%定量分析模型
의군산법%유전산법%구간편최소이승법%화다%화청소%정량분석모형
ant colony optimization%genetic algorithm%interval partial least squares%scented tea%anthocyanin%quantitative analysis model
以建立花茶花青素含量的最优近红外光谱模型为目标,对比研究了蚁群算法(Ant Colony Optimization, ACO)和遗传算法(Genetic Algorithm, GA)优化近红外光谱谱区的效果。ACO-iPLS将全光谱划分为12个子区间时,优选出第1、9、10共3个子区间,所建的校正集和预测集相关系数分别为0.9013和0.8642;交互验证均方根误差(RMSECV)和预测均方根误差(RMSEP)分别为0.1600 mg/g和0.2020 mg/g;GA-iPLS将全光谱划分为15个子区间时,优选出第1、5共2个子区间,所建模型的校正集和预测集相关系数分别为0.9063和0.8793,交互验证均方根误差(RMSECV)和预测均方根误差(RMSEP)分别为0.1560 mg/g和0.2060 mg/g。研究结果表明:ACO-iPLS和GA-iPLS均可以有效选择近红外光谱特征波长,其中GA-iPLS模型的精度更高。
以建立花茶花青素含量的最優近紅外光譜模型為目標,對比研究瞭蟻群算法(Ant Colony Optimization, ACO)和遺傳算法(Genetic Algorithm, GA)優化近紅外光譜譜區的效果。ACO-iPLS將全光譜劃分為12箇子區間時,優選齣第1、9、10共3箇子區間,所建的校正集和預測集相關繫數分彆為0.9013和0.8642;交互驗證均方根誤差(RMSECV)和預測均方根誤差(RMSEP)分彆為0.1600 mg/g和0.2020 mg/g;GA-iPLS將全光譜劃分為15箇子區間時,優選齣第1、5共2箇子區間,所建模型的校正集和預測集相關繫數分彆為0.9063和0.8793,交互驗證均方根誤差(RMSECV)和預測均方根誤差(RMSEP)分彆為0.1560 mg/g和0.2060 mg/g。研究結果錶明:ACO-iPLS和GA-iPLS均可以有效選擇近紅外光譜特徵波長,其中GA-iPLS模型的精度更高。
이건립화다화청소함량적최우근홍외광보모형위목표,대비연구료의군산법(Ant Colony Optimization, ACO)화유전산법(Genetic Algorithm, GA)우화근홍외광보보구적효과。ACO-iPLS장전광보화분위12개자구간시,우선출제1、9、10공3개자구간,소건적교정집화예측집상관계수분별위0.9013화0.8642;교호험증균방근오차(RMSECV)화예측균방근오차(RMSEP)분별위0.1600 mg/g화0.2020 mg/g;GA-iPLS장전광보화분위15개자구간시,우선출제1、5공2개자구간,소건모형적교정집화예측집상관계수분별위0.9063화0.8793,교호험증균방근오차(RMSECV)화예측균방근오차(RMSEP)분별위0.1560 mg/g화0.2060 mg/g。연구결과표명:ACO-iPLS화GA-iPLS균가이유효선택근홍외광보특정파장,기중GA-iPLS모형적정도경고。
Optimization of Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for quantitative analysis of the anthocyanin content in scented tea was discussed by selecting the optimal spectra intervals from the whole NIR spectroscopy using two variable models: Ant colony optimization interval partial least squares (ACO-iPLS) and Genetic Algorithm interval partial least squares (GA-iPLS). The ACO-iPLS full-spectrum was split into 12 intervals. The optimal intervals selected were the 1st interval, 9th interval and 10th interval. The calibration and prediction correlation coefficient of ACO-iPLS model were 0.901 3 and 0.864 2, in which the root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) of 0.160 0 mg/g and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.206 0 mg/g were achieved.As in the GA-iPLS model, the data set was split into 15 intervals for optimization where 1st and 5th intervals were selected. The calibration and prediction correlation coefficient of GA-iPLS model were 0.901 3 and 0.864 2, and the RMSECV and RMSEP of GA-iPLS models based on these intervals were 0.156 0 mg/g and 0.206 0 mg/g, respectively. The results showed that both ACO-iPLS and GA-iPLS models could efficiently select spectrum intervals for quantitative analysis of anthocyanin in scented tea. The optimal GA-iPLS model had better performance with higher accuracy.